I created a virtual contest, but I made a mistake in setting the time. This competition is in the gym. I now want to cancel this virtual participation and create a new one. But I didn't find the cancellation interface. Thanks in advice.
# | User | Rating |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 3985 |
2 | jiangly | 3814 |
3 | jqdai0815 | 3682 |
4 | Benq | 3529 |
5 | orzdevinwang | 3526 |
6 | ksun48 | 3517 |
7 | Radewoosh | 3410 |
8 | hos.lyric | 3399 |
9 | ecnerwala | 3392 |
9 | Um_nik | 3392 |
# | User | Contrib. |
---|---|---|
1 | cry | 169 |
2 | maomao90 | 162 |
2 | Um_nik | 162 |
4 | atcoder_official | 161 |
5 | djm03178 | 158 |
6 | -is-this-fft- | 157 |
7 | adamant | 155 |
8 | awoo | 154 |
8 | Dominater069 | 154 |
10 | luogu_official | 150 |
I created a virtual contest, but I made a mistake in setting the time. This competition is in the gym. I now want to cancel this virtual participation and create a new one. But I didn't find the cancellation interface. Thanks in advice.
The congruence equation is one of the fundamental concepts in number theory:
Let $$$m$$$ be a given positive integer, and let $$$a$$$ and $$$b$$$ be integers. If $$$m\mid(a−b)$$$, then $$$a$$$ is congruent to $$$b$$$ modulo $$$m$$$, denoted as $$$a\equiv b\pmod m$$$ or $$$a\equiv b(m)$$$.
Other forms of expressing congruence include:
Properties of congruence equations:
Finding the smallest positive integer solution for the congruence equation $$$ax \equiv 1 \pmod b$$$ involves transforming the equation into $$$ax+by=1$$$ and using the Extended Euclidean Algorithm (EXGCD) to solve it.
The fundamental equation is to find $$$ax+by=1$$$, for instance, $$$ 8x+3y=1 $$$.
A step-by-step breakdown is performed to arrive at a solution:
%
operations or loops are employed to handle these cases.Addition and multiplication operations are modular-friendly, but division isn't. Multiplicative inverse, denoted as $$$b^{-1}$$$ with respect to modulo $$$p$$$ (where $$$p$$$ is a prime number), satisfies the equation $$$(b\times b^{-1}) \pmod p = 1$$$. The range of $$$b^{-1}$$$ is $$$[0,p-1]$$$.
NOI Gold Coach Wang_Xiaoguang taught me last weekend.
The $$$\text{Miller Rabin}$$$ algorithm is a randomization algorithm used to test whether an integer is a prime. It is based on Fermat's small theorem and quadratic detection theorem, and determines whether an integer may be a prime number through multiple random tests. The basic idea of the algorithm is to perform a series of randomness proofs, and if an integer passes these tests, it is likely to be a prime number. If an integer fails any of these tests, then it is definitely not a prime number.
The following are the basic steps of the $$$\text {Miller Rabin} $$$ algorithm: 1. Select the integer $$$n$$$ to be tested: First, select an integer $$$n$$$ greater than $$$1$$$ to determine if it is a prime number.
Decomposing $$$n-1$$$ into $$$2^t\times u$$$: Calculate the prime factorization of $$$n-1$$$, where $$$u$$$ is an odd number and $$$t$$$ is a non negative integer, representing the number of factors $$$2$$$.
Select Random Evidence Number $$$a$$$: Randomly select an integer $$$a$$$ from the interval $$$[2,n-2]$$$.
Calculate $$$v=a^u \mod n$$$: Calculate the modulus of $$$n$$$ to the power of $$$u$$$ of $$$a$$$, and obtain $$$v$$$.
Check if $$$v$$$ is equal to $$$1$$$:
If $$$v=1$$$, then continue with the next round of testing and choose a new random evidence number of $$$a$$$.
If $$$v$$$ is not equal to $$$1$$$, go to the next step.
Perform the $$$t$$$ sub square operation on $$$v(v=v ^ 2\mod n)$$$ while checking if $$$v$$$ is equal to $$$n-1$$$.
If $$$v=n-1$$$, continue with the next round of testing and select a new random evidence number of $$$a$$$.
If $$$v$$$ is not equal to $$$n-1$$$, continue the square operation and check up to a maximum of $$$t-1$$$ times.
If $$$v$$$ is still not equal to $$$n-1$$$ after $$$t$$$ squared detection, then $$$n$$$ is considered not a prime number and can be determined to be a composite number.
If $$$v$$$ equals $$$n-1$$$ after $$$t$$$ tests, then $$$n$$$ may be a prime number and continue with the next round of testing.
Summary: The reliability of the $$$\text{Miller Rabin}$$$ algorithm depends on the selection of iteration times and random evidence numbers. Usually, conducting multiple tests (such as $$$15$$$ or more) and selecting a random number of evidence can make the algorithm highly reliable in practice, but it is still a random algorithm. Therefore, although it can quickly exclude most composite numbers, it cannot provide absolute proof.
Code:
import random
def millerRabin(n):
if n<3 or n%2==0:
return n==2
u,t=n-1,0
while u%2==0:
u=u//2
t=t+1
test_time=8
for i in range(test_time):
a=random.randint(2,n-1)
v=pow(a,u,n)
if v==1:
continue
s=0
while s<t:
if v==n-1:
break
v=v*v%n
s=s+1
if s==t:
return False
return True
t=int(input())
for i in range(t):
x=int(input())
y=millerRabin(x)
if y==True:
print("YES")
if y==False:
print("NO")
Name |
---|