Hello! Codeforces Round 888 (Div. 3) will start at Jul/25/2023 17:35 (Moscow time). You will be offered 6-8 problems with expected difficulties to compose an interesting competition for participants with ratings up to 1600. However, all of you who wish to take part and have a rating of 1600 or higher, can register for the round unofficially.

The round will be hosted by rules of educational rounds (extended ICPC). Thus, solutions will be judged on preliminary tests during the round, and after the round, it will be a 12-hour phase of **open hacks**.

You will be given **7 problems** and **2 hours and 15 minutes** to solve them.

Note that the **penalty** for the wrong submission in this round is **10 minutes**.

Remember that only the trusted participants of the third division will be included in the official standings table. As it is written by link, this is a compulsory measure for combating unsporting behavior. To qualify as a *trusted participant of the third division*, you must:

- take part in at least five rated rounds (and solve at least one problem in each of them)
- do not have a point of 1900 or higher in the rating.

**Regardless of whether you are a trusted participant of the third division or not, if your rating is less than 1600, then the round will be rated for you.**

Problems have been created and written by our team: myav, Aris, Gornak40, senjougaharin and Vladosiya.

We would like to thank:

MikeMirzayanov for Polygon and Codeforces platforms.

tute7627 for red testing

oversolver, sevlll777, pavlekn, zwezdinv, Sokol080808, 74TrAkToR, vladmart, EJIC_B_KEDAX, Vladithur, KseniaShk, Be_dos for yellow testing

moonpie24, FBI, meowcneil, NintsiChkhaidze, Phantom_Performer, SashaT9, spike1236, Kalashnikov for purple testing

TheGoodest, Pa_sha, Sasha0738 for blue testing

Good luck!

**UPD**: Editorial

May 19, 2023 what

May be Time travel xD

hoping to solve atleast 3 problems

it's ironic that all the testers are not actually eligible for div 3...

except cyan ones

cyan wasnt there when i posted the comment lol

Hoping to become Expert in this round

.

why is there no cyan, green or gray testers?

i hope to be blue this time

A better version of the above given meme.

Oh nice idea!

I did not Copy it. You are just being jealous that it is the better than yours.

I think this makes a lot more sense.

but, rainboy is blue.

color doesn't matter the thing that matters is your coding skills

Yes Yes Color doesn't matter but what matters is Common sense which I can see is not common in you.

If you would have checked you would have known that rainboy is blue not purple, or are you color blind.

Regards;

Aiman.

rainboy's rating is changing fast, used to be purple, and this picture may be outdated, so you cannot say he/she is color blind (rainboy, on Jul 23, 2023; rainboy, on Jul 16, 2023; rainboy, on Jul 11, 2023; rainboy, on Jun 24, 2023).

rainboy's rating is changing fast, and used to be purple (rainboy, on Jul 23, 2023; rainboy, on Jul 16, 2023; rainboy, on Jul 11, 2023; rainboy, on Jun 24, 2023).

I have a really good feeling about that this would be my last rated Div. 3 contest and I would have become a blue expert after this 888ᵗʰ round of Codeforces!! May the Force be with us

.

This aged well

^^ i also became a green

I have exam (TT — TT)

Obviously, exams cannot be compared to codeforces :) Give up exams and choose to fail, embrace Div. 3

yaaaa Now,Let's ditch the exams and embrace our coding superpowers! (っ▀¯▀)つ

Hopefully, we will see a problem connected with number $$$8$$$, lol.

I think most of Div.3's are made by Vladosiya

Now I'm mostly helping new authors and sharing experience:)

why do you only make Div.3 why not Div.4

best part of the comment section is I see anime pfpS and discover new interesting animes

I think this will be a good one

I hope this round will be the great round of Div.3!

spoiler : it wont

Yes it was but sadly A is hardeset problem

Good luck

Out of competition, but I'll try my best to do it ^_^

It is so good to have a contest every few days, hopefully i can cross 1500 today

I don't know if this is the right place to say this, but I've noticed for a while now that div3 round announcements say that you can only qualify as a trusted div3 participant if you "do not have a point of 1900 or higher in the rating." Shouldn't that number be 1600 instead?

I think this is a translation error. My understanding (from the original announcement of the trusted participant system) is that you must

neverhave had a rating above 1900. In other words, if your rating is above 1900 at one point but then falls below 1600, Div. 3 rounds will be rated for you, but you will not appear in the official standings.Experts to lower rankings in Div.3 be like:

After playing div2,I feel that div3 and div4 are still suitable for me

literally no one asked

Nobody asks for any comment. By your logic, comment section should always be empty.

In first line of blog "You will be offered 6-8 problems" .Later "You will be given 7 problems and 2 hours and 15 minutes to solve them ".So, 7 problems will be there ?.

It's fun that the round will be rated for me.

tbh I don't see it as fun because you may become cm today by spamming div-3 , I think div-3 should be unrated for participants if they are >=1600 during participation even if they registered for div-3 when <1600

But I won't be in this contest because my mom doesn't let me stay up all night.

come on bro stay up , don't be a mommy's kid

Why do you have to stay up all night? Look at tourist. Maybe he just need to wake up and spend about just only half an hour to ac this contest (equal to the time i understood problem E). Maybe u can follow that way :D.

## J4F

hope to be specialist in this contest

I am at the lowest confidence in my life.

Good Luck everyone

Good LuckI will solve atleast 5 problems.

so she knows what awaits her. emmmmmmhahahahaha~

Thank you Vladosiya very much. This is the best Div.3 contest I've ever written.

Why I an rated ??????

Because you registered while you were specialist.

┭┮﹏┭┮

Readforces

my guy only read A and decided to conclude the entire contest was readforces

It is still readforces because half the time I'm trying to decipher what the problems are saying, the statements can definitely be phrased better which a lot of people have mentioned also

readforces isnt unclear wording, its when u got paragraphs upon paragraphs for a problem statement

Yes/NoForces

D: Let difference d[0]=a[0], d[i]=a[i]-a[i-1] when i>0. If the missing prefix sum is n*(n+1)/2, then {d[i]} will be a permutation of [1, n] missing one element. Therefore, for this case we need to check in {d[i]} are pairwise distinct and inside range [1, n]. Otherwise, we will have a[n-1]=n*(n+1)/2, and n-2 elements of {d[i]} will be inside [1, n] and distinct, the last element will be the sum of 2 missing elements. So for this case we need to check if {d[i]} contains n-2 different numbers inside [1, n].

E: First for potions with infinite supply we can just set their cost to 0. Then, if potion i can be obtained mixing {j[1], j[2], ...}, we add a directed edge (j[t] --> i) for each j[t]. Since no potion can be obtained by mixing itself, these edges will from a DAG (directed acyclic graph), and we can run dp on the topological order of the DAG: Let dp[i]=sum(cost[j]) where edge (j --> i) exists, and cost[i]=min(cost[i], dp[i]).

F: If a[i], a[j] and x have only 1 bit, then if a[i]==0, a[j]==0, we can set x=1 then (a[i]^x)&(a[j]^x)=1, if a[i]==1, a[j]==1, we can set x=0 then (a[i]^x)&(a[j]^x)=1, if a[i]!=a[j], no matter how we set x, (a[i]^x)&(a[j]^x)=0. So we need to find (i, j) such that a[i]==a[j]. For general cases, we need to minimize (a[i]^a[j]) so that sum(t: 0<=t<k, the t-th bits of a[i] and a[j] are same)(1<<t) = (1<<k)-1-(a[i]^a[j]) is maximized. This can be processed using a trie, or sort a[i] and find the minimal a[i]^a[i+1].

G: For a single query (a, b, e), the maximum height of nodes on the path cannot exceed h[a]+e, which means, we can pass an edge (u, v) if max(h[u], h[v])<=h[a]+e. Therefore, we can sort queries by h[a]+e and sort edges by max(h[u], h[v]), then solving queries using dsu.

F can be solved by property of xors:

min(x^y, y^z) < x^z , for all non-negative integers x, y, z (x < y < z)

so we can sort a, and find min xor of all a[i] ^ a[i + 1]

Is there any intuitive proof of this property of xor?

yes, you can read it here

Find first bit so that: -it is in some of the numbers -it is not in all of them Then it's either in $$$y$$$ and $$$z$$$ or only in $$$z$$$ (because $$$x < y < z$$$). In both cases it can be seen that this bit is in $$$x \oplus z$$$ but not in $$$min(x \oplus y, y \oplus z)$$$. Later bits won't matter

Why ans can be calculate by ans = mn | ((a[i+1].fi ^ ((1 << k) — 1)) & (a[i].fi ^ ((1 << k) — 1))); ?

actually it is just: ans = (a[i+1].fi ^ ((1 << k) — 1)) & (a[i].fi ^ ((1 << k) — 1));

at first we want to maximize some (a[i] ^ x) & (a[j] ^ x), now suppose we want to use some Kth bit up to k, then you can see that Kth bit have to be in both of a[i] and a[j], or doesn't appear in both of them,

proofsuppose a[i] has Kth bit and a[j] has not, then let's try to get this bit in our result

using Kth bit in x: (1 ^ 1) & (0 ^ 1) = 0, not using Kth bit in x: (1 ^ 0) & (0 ^ 0) = 0

from above it is easy to see that it is efficient to minimize xor

so we don't care about cases where a[i] has some bit and a[j] hasn't or reversed.

there left two cases:

|1. both a[i] and a[j] have some Kth bit

to get this bit we shouldn't use it in our x, (1 ^ 0) & (1 ^ 0) == 1

|2. both a[i] and a[j] have not some Kth bit

to get this bit we have to use it in our x, (0 ^ 1) & (0 ^ 1) == 1

since we can use all bits up to k, our x should contain all bits up to k, where a[i] and a[j] haven't them.

|1. (a[i+1].fi ^ ((1 << k) — 1) taking all zeros from a[i] up to kth bit

|2. (a[i].fi ^ ((1 << k) — 1) taking all zeros from a[j] up to kth bit

|3. (a[i+1].fi ^ ((1 << k) — 1)) & (a[i].fi ^ ((1 << k) — 1)) combining zeros, where a[i]'s Kth bit = 0 and a[j]'s Kth bit == 0

How do you thing is it possible to solve G if queries are online?

Using persistent DSU

Maybe we need to use some persistent data structures.

For each edge $$$(u,v)$$$, let the cost of the edge be $$$\max(h[u],h[v])$$$. Then for query $$$(u,v)$$$ where $$$u\neq v$$$, the minimum of the maximum height of the nodes on the path is equal to the minimum of the maximum cost of the edges on the path. So we can build MST and use binary lifting to find the answer.

I did try to write the binary lifting solution for G (feeling dumb after finding out doing it offline is much easier). I get a WA on test 4. I'm not sure whether my implementation is wrong or there indeed exists a counter-case that one of the best path doesn't lies on the MST.

215605164

Maybe my online solution can help you 215601542.

I write the Kruskal's algorithm and build a tree to solve it.

Build a kruskal reconstruction tree(or dsu tree) and find lca of the 2 nodes in each query

minimizing xor of two elements can be done easier: sort the array, answer will always be the xor of two consecutive elements.

F can be solved by max prefix for the binary presentation,

there's maximum two unique numbers with the same max prefix.once we identify the max prefix, we can use a map to collect the ones that have the same max prefix, or we can just sort and compare adjacent elements.Bad statement for most problems :(

Indeed one of the worst contest ever

Yes-NoForces!!

i feel language was bit difficult.

Learning tries was after all worth it saving me today. Problem F felt really good to AC :)

It can be solved using recursion without tries

can you share your implementation

[submission:https://mirror.codeforces.com/contest/1851/submission/215630074]

The key idea is to find two numbers with miminum xor. Let's try to find to numbers with common $$$k-1$$$ th bit. Divide the array into two so that in two arrays $$$k-1$$$ th bit is common in all numbers. Solve recursively for $$$k-2$$$ th bit and so on. If you put ending conditions correctly, this will work

funny my solution looks almost exactly like yours. mine didnt pass tho :(

215616590

Bro ours look same. even both of us failed on same testcase :(

Can also be solved by taking xor of two closest numbers. (Adjacent elements in sorted array).

You just have to find optimal 'x' for all the pairs of adjacent elements of the sorted array of 'a', whichever pair gives max (ai^x & aj^x) is the ans.

whats the reasoning behind adjacent elements ?

I have an intutive explanation, for a bit to be included in the maximum answer either its not set in the two chosen indices or set in both, exploiting this information note that we can greedily start by trying to get the kth bit set first, so the whole array is divided into two multisets, one which doesnt have this bit set and other one has all the elements with this bit set, how to achieve this? Just sort the array, all the numbers which have kth bit set will be together, this holds(try to visualize this, it will make sense), Now if I want the kth bit to be set in the maximum answer, the final answer is going to be any two adjacent ( Just note that all the numbers with kth bit set will be consecutive, then among those all with k-1th bit will be consecutive and so on, and also numbers with kth bit set the numbers with k-1th wont set will be together, since thats just the nature of sorting), so if you were to write a bruteforce divide and conquer the final set will be some two consecutive numbers. Sorry if its lengthy but its a bit intutive to explain by writing

It was hard for me to concentrate on reading those problems, I liked it tho

D was awful, imho

I think my F is hackable

Submitted just after the contest got over.

Overall looks like a decent div3 contest, I have enjoyed solving A-E.

A— might be a little bit too much text for a div3A problem, but nothing too extremeBandC— both are fine problems imoD— some case work, nothing too dramatic, but I still have no idea how to prove my solution (also randomly got 50 additional penalty because I trolled myself again)E— a problem about my favorite topic, I can see how this statement can confuse some people, but I myself probably couldn't phrase the condition of a graph being a DAG betterHow to solve E ?

reread the statement and you ll see that if you draw the graph of elements (needing each other) it will be a dag -> just do a simple dp on it. my submission: 215587840

I thought that G was about finding a path, so that $$$max - min \le e$$$. Btw, would there be a solution if this was asked?

Lets Go Pupil here I come..........

rank 834 can add 39 to become expert?

By rating predication, you will get +30

Use this extension for rating prediction Carrot

Nice problems but bad statments for most of them , thanks anyway!

What the hell

Can someone share their solution to B, C and D.

B — sort odd values and even values while not swapping odd and even with eachother, then check if array is sorted. C — you need to find shortest prefix that there are at least $$$k$$$ occurences of $$$c_1$$$, and the shortest suffix that there are at least $$$k$$$ occurences of last color. If first and last are equal, you just need to check that there are $$$k$$$ tiles with color $$$c_1$$$, else you need to check that sum of lengths of the found prefix and suffix is less or equal to $$$n$$$ D — didn't attempt

Sort the array and compare it with the original array if both elements at same position are odd/even then its YES if NO then NO

problem E is an easy version of one of the provincial team selection test for NOI of Ahhui, China 2014(AHOI2014) problem. See in here:https://www.luogu.com.cn/problem/P4042

a

It's a place where u recognize how stupid u are.

can some one explain this sample case for problem E

4 2

1 1 5 4

2 4

3 2 4 3

0

2 2 4

1 2

how is the answer 0 0 0 0 , here

Notice that Nastya already has unlimited numbers of potions 2 and 4 so the answer for 2 and 4 is 0. Also, to get potion 3 you can use potion 2 and 4 so you don't need any coins for potion 3 and the same for potion 1 so the answer is 0 0 0 0. Hope this helps!

Thanks , I got it

potions 3 can be obtained by potions 2(costs 0) + 4(costs 0) = 0

potions 1 can be obtained by potions 2(costs 0) + 3(costs 0) + 4(costs 0) = 0

Thanks , I got it

In problem A, is there any specific reason why Vlad cannot talk to the person on the same steps of the escalator??

`Two people with heights a and b can have a conversation on the escalator if they are standing on different steps`

It is given in problem statementI know bro.... it just bothered me becoz it is not so realistic

ohhh, XD

There is one type of escalators that has very narrow steps, that each step can only hold 1 person. I think the author is referring to that type of escalators??? :)

but many people can be on the h+m and h-m step ? weird escalator

lmao didn't think of this

It might be realistic because in some cities it is a known rule that people stand on the right and walk/run on the left side of an escalator. So, two people standing and talking on the same step will bother people in a rush.

Oh i see.. thanks

Vlad has bad breath.

Hello, could someone please help me figure out why my code is giving a runtime error on E? I don't usually use python https://mirror.codeforces.com/contest/1851/submission/215620727

Spoiler (explanation)You can think of it as a depth-first traversal for each end product, towards the ones it depends on

Maybe it's the python recursion limit/deep recursion issue, I know very little about python but I've seen similar kinds of questions regarding recursion/dfs traversal of a tree popping up here on codeforces.

That must be it! I will try with stack, thanks for the tip.

EDIT: That was it, AC'd now. Thanks!

By default python has 1000 as the maximum recursion depth. Theoretically you've got to change it via sys.setrecursionlimit(), let's say sys.setrecursionlimit(10**5) and then it works, but in practice it will most likely give you memory limit exceeded on codeforces. So you just have to rewrite it without using recursion sadly, just directly use stack.

Interesting stuff! Glad I used python this time, got to learn :D

Lol I didn't even understand the statement of problem E. Eventually, i just did wat-task-told-me-to-do + my guess and intuition and AC-ed :D

if problem E, the statement "Moreover, no potion can be obtained from itself through one or more mixing processes." is removed, I guess we need a scc to solve it?

No, because if there is a cycle, then you:

a) have one of the potions in the cycle which is trivial or

b) don't have any of the potions. In that case, you will eventually revisit a node. Since a revisit is only possible due to a cycle, you will realize that the node came via a cycle and then can just buy the cheapest potion in that cycle.

I solved it using modified dijkstra, checked the editorial and was confused so read the problem statement again. I think even the top folks solved it using modified dijkstra only.

Time to switch to hackforces

Problem statement is very hard

Thank you for having blank lines after the answer after every test case in Problem G. It made understanding the sample answer easier.

Could you share your approach for G?

Let $$$H$$$ be your current height and $$$E$$$ your current energy. If we go $$$x$$$ units up, your height changes to $$$H + x$$$ and energy changes to $$$E - x$$$. On the other hand if we go $$$x$$$ units down, your height changes to $$$H - x$$$ and energy changes to $$$E + x$$$. In both cases, the sum of your height and energy stays constant (equal to $$$H + E$$$, the sum of your original height and energy).

Consider some query where you start from mountain $$$a$$$ with $$$e$$$ energy. This means that anywhere you go, the sum of your height and energy will be $$$h_a + e$$$. In order for your energy to stay non-negative, your height must not go above $$$h_a + e$$$. This means that you can go to any mountain $$$u$$$ with height $$$h_u \le h_a + e$$$ and you cannot go to any other mountains.

Now, we can solve the problem in the following way:

Consider the mountains and roads as an undirected graph. We will keep a DSU to tell which nodes (mountains) are reachable from each other.

Sort all nodes $$$u$$$ in increasing order of $$$h_u$$$ and sort all queries in increasing order of $$$h_a + e$$$.

When handling a query, we need to add all nodes $$$u$$$ with $$$h_u \le h_a + e$$$ and edges between them into the DSU. We can iterate over all nodes satisfying the above which have not yet been considered and add all edges going from those nodes to nodes with lower height to the DSU. After that, the answer to the query is

`YES`

iff nodes $$$a$$$ and $$$b$$$ are in the same component.Doing the above for all queries using a two-pointer approach is $$$O(n\cdot\alpha(n))$$$.

Total time complexity: $$$O(n\log n)$$$ due to sorting.

(slow) implementation: 215567991

Hope to become newbie after this contest

I couldn't debug G in time.Loved all the problems.

My thiscode gives correct output on my compiler and also on online compilers but somehow this is giving wrong answer on the Codeforces judge , what's the reason , please look into it.

Your binary search could return -1 as index of array which is an undefined-behaviour.

I have doubt in problem statement of problem E.It is not mentioned whether cycle will exists or not.

“It is guaranteed that no potion can be obtained from itself through one or more mixing processes.“

"It is guaranteed that no potion can be obtained from itself through one or more mixing processes."

In F there is no need to know Trie , my solution is just greedy + binary search

my solution was just sorting array and checking answers for consecutive numbers

yeah watched it , your solution best solution

Can anyone please explain the statement of problem e i still can't get it

There are $$$n$$$ potions, each has its own cost. Each of the potions can either be bought or obtained by mixing some of the other potions. You have an unlimited number of $$$k$$$ potions which means you can use them for free. For each potion determine the minimal cost you should spend in order to obtain it.

i took this contest while in an airport lol

can someone help me understand why am I getting runtime error for this code (problem C round 888 div3):

Try this testcase

Can E be solved using Dijkstra?

Why am I not in the standings?

If you check the "unofficial" box, it shows me, but if you uncheck it, it doesn't.

Remember that only the trusted participants of the third division will be included in the official standings table. As it is written by link, this is a compulsory measure for combating unsporting behavior. To qualify as a trusted participant of the third division, you must:

take part in at least five rated rounds (and solve at least one problem in each of them) do not have a point of 1900 or higher in the rating.

F is similar to 1721D.

waiting for editorial...

I was able to solve one problem, but still am unrated. Any reason for that?? (This was my first ever contest. Sorry if I'm being dumb)

To qualify as a trusted participant of the third division, you must:

Hey, one thing to clarify, does the triangle sign at the very right of the standings table mean the rating change?

Another question, Will I get the ratings of my 5 contests added, or won't they be added? (After i become eligible for rating)

It will be rated for you. Wait for the system tests to get over.

but kgb said that I need to be qualified for Div 3, by participating in at least 5 rated contests and solving at least 1 problem.

"Regardless of whether you are a trusted participant of the third division or not, if your rating is less than 1600, then the round will be rated for you."

This is what's written immediately below in bold.

Boy was that a hard round. I could solve A and B in the first 40 minutes, and could only think of a DP solution for C :cry:

Doesn't require DP though.

I'm sure it doesn't; guess I've been practicing way too much DP (and not other things) haha

Lol, initially, I too thought of a DP solution, seeing that it requires subsequence matching sort of problem. However, observing that it only requires checking of possibility of the pattern rather than optimization, I thought of the other solution.

Ah, that's cool! What's the other method?

Why the contest is begin shown unrated despite of being written "rated for less than 1600"?

It is rated,ratings will get updated after system testing.

seems that I have my first aked Div.3 contest :)

I failed system test on problem D because of integer overflow, and missed the chance to solve all the problems during the contest :(

Who knows, has system testing already ended or not?

Yes, it ended, hacks included

thanks

My solve E O(n) has Time Limit 14 bruh?!?!?!

It's not O(n),you're not updating p(i).

Testing has finished.When will rating update ?

My solution for D fell on system tests because I used int instead of long long in one line where I forgot a_i <= 1e18 when I was writing it. This is really annoying, and I think that a test case like that should've been on main tests. But oh well, lesson learned, from now on I'm always using #define int long long

So do I!

Next message: "My solution got TLE on system tests, then I submitted it without #define int long long and got AC. I think that a test case like that should've been on main tests"

Reached Pupil after this contest that I'm happy

Hoorah! My rating became >1000 this round :D

This contest is quite good

Finally made it to Pupil after a year of hard-work 😊

Congratulations!

https://mirror.codeforces.com/contest/1851/submission/216352004

wrong answer Jury has better answer (13) than participant (12) (test case 1)

Jury output: 1 3 14 My output: 1 3 12

(3⊕14)&(1⊕14)=(0011⊕1110)&(0001⊕1110)=1101&1111=1101=13

(3⊕12)&(1⊕12)=(0011⊕1100)&(0001⊕1100)=1111&1101=1101=13

What is wrong with 12 as 'x'?

Your output is 1 3 13 as I see

Hello MikeMirzayanov,

Today I got a message from the system regarding the coincidence of my submission with my friend decltype_t submission.It is because of using common resource. In these codes we used the same templates for graph, topological sort, and for debugging. This is the proof for same. Graph template Topological sort template Debug template. However, the main logic is different.

We(Me and decltype_t) hail from same college and follow the same resources for practicing. We also have a combined repository. You can see the same here. I agree that it's my mistake that I didn't give the credit to the author for using his/her template. You can also check our previous graph or tree based question solutions where we have been using the same templates.

Thank you for providing this excellent platform.

my solution got skipped just because logic looks like others but i worked it after one wrong submission and just optimized it several times so not my fault it looks like others solutions

Dear MikeMirzayanov , kindly look into this as my logic was based on optimization of if else cluster statements in previous submissions

thanking in advanced for looking into this!!

Attention!

Your solution 215580877 for the problem 1851E significantly coincides with solutions Milind_Sharma/215580877, fredreicc_/215618955. Such a coincidence is a clear rules violation. Note that unintentional leakage is also a violation. For example, do not use ideone.com with the default settings (public access to your code). If you have conclusive evidence that a coincidence has occurred due to the use of a common source published before the competition, write a comment to post about the round with all the details. More information can be found at http://mirror.codeforces.com/blog/entry/8790. Such violation of the rules may be the reason for blocking your account or other penalties. In case of repeated violations, your account may be blocked.

This is ridiculous, having same logic does not mean copied code, all of my submissions are now skipped. I have never copied a single code in any of my past contest. This is clearly afalse positive.I fail to see how my code is similar to the other user, also I submitted around 1 hour earlier.Please take a look at the codes yourself and decide 215580877 and 215618955.

MikeMirzayanov Vladosiya

MikeMirzayanov Vladosiya I have too been plagarised in this contest unnecessarily. I have even solved F problem that too within first 30 min. please check my code its not at all similar with others. I dont understand why I got plag. I had simple dfs call so that i can calculate the answer minimum just by topo sort. PLease see my code and give my ratings back. Its clearly wrong to plag someone who works hard. Kindly look into it and help me out.

'MikeMirzayanov Vladosiya Your solution 215615024 for the problem 1851E significantly coincides with solutions steve58/215601188 ...This is something not expected from codeforces the solutions by this guy and me is completely different I have used a simple graph topo sort which is having very common template of dfs call let me show you my code:

Here after taking the cost and making changes in its value depending upon free resources I had topological sorting in my code.I have used a simple dfs function which goes and checks its neighbours ahead then finally in ans array i stored the final minimum value of the cost and after topo sort value. My code is way different from one I am plagarized with . Please look in it and give my ratings back.

Hello, MikeMirzayanov Today, I've received a message from noreply@codeforces.com that my code for the problems A and B are similar to the codes of the user kishorenanda. I really don't know this person and even where is he (or she) from. The codes are really short, so they could be similar to the codes of any other person who had just the same idea. But now all the solutions that I've sent to the system are erased from my official sendings. Rewatch my solutions, please. My solution for A: 215511238 My solution for B: 215514366

any idea for problem E (advance)? Where the graph has cycles?