How internally upper_bound for sorted vector(in ascending order) works in c++. Let say 'A' is a sorted vector.Then how upper_bound(A.begin(),A.end(),x) will directly give iterator to first element greater than x. Thanks in advance.
# | User | Rating |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 3985 |
2 | jiangly | 3814 |
3 | jqdai0815 | 3682 |
4 | Benq | 3529 |
5 | orzdevinwang | 3526 |
6 | ksun48 | 3517 |
7 | Radewoosh | 3410 |
8 | hos.lyric | 3399 |
9 | ecnerwala | 3392 |
9 | Um_nik | 3392 |
# | User | Contrib. |
---|---|---|
1 | cry | 169 |
2 | maomao90 | 162 |
2 | Um_nik | 162 |
4 | atcoder_official | 161 |
5 | djm03178 | 158 |
6 | -is-this-fft- | 157 |
7 | adamant | 155 |
8 | awoo | 154 |
8 | Dominater069 | 154 |
10 | luogu_official | 150 |
How internally upper_bound for sorted vector(in ascending order) works in c++. Let say 'A' is a sorted vector.Then how upper_bound(A.begin(),A.end(),x) will directly give iterator to first element greater than x. Thanks in advance.
Name |
---|
Auto comment: topic has been updated by hellomoto (previous revision, new revision, compare).
The functional behavior of the
std::upper_bound()
template is described in www.cplusplus.com.It is basically based on binary search. Therefore, its time-complexity should be , provided that random-access of any item is done in constant-time that is independent of problem size which is the count of items between the first and the last item.
thanks.
With pleasure.