Just as reminder, the round is scheduled at 16:00 UTC. Top 1000 contestants advance to Round 2.
| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | ecnerwala | 3844 |
| 2 | Benq | 3792 |
| 3 | tourist | 3719 |
| 4 | VivaciousAubergine | 3647 |
| 5 | jiangly | 3616 |
| 6 | ksun48 | 3595 |
| 7 | Kevin114514 | 3491 |
| 8 | strapple | 3486 |
| 9 | Um_nik | 3376 |
| 10 | turmax | 3371 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 162 |
| 2 | adamant | 148 |
| 3 | Um_nik | 146 |
| 4 | Dominater069 | 143 |
| 5 | errorgorn | 141 |
| 6 | cry | 138 |
| 7 | Proof_by_QED | 136 |
| 8 | YuukiS | 135 |
| 9 | chromate00 | 134 |
| 10 | soullless | 133 |
Just as reminder, the round is scheduled at 16:00 UTC. Top 1000 contestants advance to Round 2.
| Name |
|---|



I've solved problem B large but got Wrong Answer because of silly problem my code
when I divide my long double-type variable by 2 million times it becomes too small and tend to zero after that when I multiply it by some numbers it still zero.
actully what I wanted to compute is [ C(n,k)+C(n,k+1)+C(n,k+2) .... + C(n,n) ] / 2^n for some numbers n,k
fails large input file but my algorithm is correct.
What I did was compute c(n,k)=C(n,k)/2^n in a table of doubles. The combination of multiplication and division by large doubles can be tricky, so it's good practice not to use it — most of the time, it can be replaced by simple multiplication and summation.
I played with Google Charts and made the following map: Google CodeJam 1st round statistics. It's just an experiment to learn Google Charts for this occasion. It shows
1000 * Round2 / (Round1A + Round1B)taken from Google CodeJam Statisics.Single person statistics can be kinda tricky, if you notice the blue countries... good job anyway