bitset < n > b1, b2;
b1 |= b2;
Is the complexity of above code O(n)? Or it works in O(1).
bitset < n > b1, b2;
b1 |= b2;
Is the complexity of above code O(n)? Or it works in O(1).
| № | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3792 |
| 2 | VivaciousAubergine | 3647 |
| 3 | Kevin114514 | 3603 |
| 4 | jiangly | 3583 |
| 5 | turmax | 3559 |
| 6 | tourist | 3541 |
| 7 | strapple | 3515 |
| 8 | ksun48 | 3461 |
| 9 | dXqwq | 3436 |
| 10 | Otomachi_Una | 3413 |
| Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
| № | Пользователь | Вклад |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 157 |
| 2 | adamant | 153 |
| 3 | Um_nik | 147 |
| 4 | Proof_by_QED | 146 |
| 5 | Dominater069 | 145 |
| 6 | errorgorn | 142 |
| 7 | cry | 139 |
| 8 | YuukiS | 135 |
| 9 | TheScrasse | 134 |
| 10 | chromate00 | 133 |
It works in approximately O(n / 64), but your n is a constant, so it works in O(1) :D
Thanks. But clear it little bit. if n = 1e3;
then complexity O ( 1000/64 ) Or O ( 1 )
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_O_notation O(1000/64)=O(1)...
Ah! Thanks a lot sir.It's now clear.