Is there any limit to the length of the string after which hashing should be avoided. Also can the hashing solutions be easily hacked in contests ?
Is there any limit to the length of the string after which hashing should be avoided. Also can the hashing solutions be easily hacked in contests ?
| № | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3792 |
| 2 | VivaciousAubergine | 3647 |
| 3 | Kevin114514 | 3603 |
| 4 | jiangly | 3583 |
| 5 | turmax | 3559 |
| 6 | tourist | 3541 |
| 7 | strapple | 3515 |
| 8 | ksun48 | 3461 |
| 9 | dXqwq | 3436 |
| 10 | Otomachi_Una | 3413 |
| Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
| № | Пользователь | Вклад |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 157 |
| 2 | adamant | 153 |
| 3 | Um_nik | 147 |
| 3 | Proof_by_QED | 147 |
| 5 | Dominater069 | 145 |
| 6 | errorgorn | 142 |
| 7 | cry | 139 |
| 8 | YuukiS | 135 |
| 9 | TheScrasse | 134 |
| 10 | chromate00 | 133 |
| Название |
|---|



According to the birthday paradox, if m = 1e9 + 9, we can random about 200000 strings and the possibility of collisions is more than 99.9999%!
Simple code can calculate the possibility:
Also, if you want to make your hashing become hard to hack, there are two possible choice:
use a long long prime as m
use two or more hash functions
Sorry for my poor English, I hope this can help you:)
Well, that might make it a bit harder to hack, but still hackable. You should also make your base randomized.