| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3792 |
| 2 | VivaciousAubergine | 3647 |
| 3 | Kevin114514 | 3603 |
| 4 | jiangly | 3583 |
| 5 | strapple | 3515 |
| 6 | tourist | 3470 |
| 7 | dXqwq | 3436 |
| 8 | Radewoosh | 3415 |
| 9 | Otomachi_Una | 3413 |
| 10 | Um_nik | 3376 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 157 |
| 2 | adamant | 153 |
| 3 | Um_nik | 146 |
| 3 | Proof_by_QED | 146 |
| 5 | Dominater069 | 145 |
| 6 | errorgorn | 141 |
| 7 | cry | 139 |
| 8 | YuukiS | 135 |
| 9 | TheScrasse | 134 |
| 10 | chromate00 | 133 |
|
0
yeah but what i meant was why cant i directly go from 3^i to 3^0 if k permits. this too has become clear because we gain more from killing off the highest powers of 3 than by creating more lower powers of 3 |
|
0
in C2 why do we always transfer from tr[i] to tr[i-1], in that order. I mean why cant we start from tr[0] to tr[i-1] and transfer from tr[i] whenever possible? this basically fails on the 180th number of tc 2 and i have no clue why. |
| Name |
|---|


