| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3792 |
| 2 | VivaciousAubergine | 3647 |
| 3 | Kevin114514 | 3603 |
| 4 | jiangly | 3583 |
| 5 | strapple | 3515 |
| 6 | tourist | 3470 |
| 7 | dXqwq | 3436 |
| 8 | Radewoosh | 3415 |
| 9 | Otomachi_Una | 3413 |
| 10 | Um_nik | 3376 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 157 |
| 2 | adamant | 152 |
| 3 | Proof_by_QED | 146 |
| 3 | Um_nik | 146 |
| 5 | Dominater069 | 144 |
| 6 | errorgorn | 141 |
| 7 | cry | 139 |
| 8 | YuukiS | 135 |
| 9 | TheScrasse | 134 |
| 10 | chromate00 | 133 |
|
On
webmasteradi →
Can we perform a large number of Range Update and Point Update Queries in less than Amortized log(n) time? , 11 years ago
0
you're free to think a solution exists... =.= |
|
On
webmasteradi →
Can we perform a large number of Range Update and Point Update Queries in less than Amortized log(n) time? , 11 years ago
+1
then there's obviously no solution faster than logn |
|
On
webmasteradi →
Can we perform a large number of Range Update and Point Update Queries in less than Amortized log(n) time? , 11 years ago
0
for example: |
|
On
webmasteradi →
Can we perform a large number of Range Update and Point Update Queries in less than Amortized log(n) time? , 11 years ago
0
yes, method of events... |
|
0
i think it is impossible |
|
+1
so complicated.. |
|
0
probably you should learn convex hull better, then the solution will be obvious for u |
|
-11
It was an unlucky contest for dreamoon |
|
-18
Accept that you're doing that for contribution, ok? |
|
0
use smth like pasteubuntu to share your code |
|
-11
you and illi are so annoying! and you're first by contribution only because of your useless stats |
|
-10
I don't think so |
|
-51
DmitriyH and you are so annoying! |
|
-11
think it up yourself |
|
+3
LOL! I did. |
|
+13
Solve every problem you meet. |
| Name |
|---|


