| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3792 |
| 2 | VivaciousAubergine | 3647 |
| 3 | Kevin114514 | 3611 |
| 4 | jiangly | 3583 |
| 5 | strapple | 3515 |
| 6 | tourist | 3470 |
| 7 | Radewoosh | 3415 |
| 8 | Um_nik | 3376 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 3361 |
| 10 | XVIII | 3345 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 162 |
| 2 | adamant | 148 |
| 3 | Um_nik | 146 |
| 4 | Dominater069 | 143 |
| 5 | errorgorn | 141 |
| 6 | cry | 138 |
| 7 | Proof_by_QED | 136 |
| 8 | YuukiS | 135 |
| 9 | chromate00 | 134 |
| 10 | soullless | 133 |
|
0
All good — I understand your test. Looking at the submissions that seem to be passing for problem C, it seems like they used what I mentioned but adjusted it a bit for the edge cases :( |
|
0
Fudge. |
|
0
What is the counter-example? Like which ones belong to which list? |
|
0
Div2 C I think I figured out... I was not sure though: is it just total — 2*(smallest + second_smallest) ? D was easier I thought... |
|
0
I thought of this, but I did not have time to implement it and it seemed a bit hacky :( |
|
0
Yeah I agree, but it shouldn't have to make a big difference since my complexity and approach were correct. |
|
0
Here is my submission if anyone can take a look: https://atcoder.jp/contests/abc184/submissions/18338763 |
|
0
I think there is a mistake in problem E... I wrote a simple BFS that should never visit a node more than once (and never try to visit a node more than 5 times due to teleport — using the fact that the closest 'a' character to the start should be the one that uses all of the potential 'a' teleports); so my algorithm should be O(m) where m is the number of edges in the graph, but it does not work because of TLE. I wrote my code in C++ |
| Name |
|---|


