https://scoreboard.egoi2025.de/

LETS GO BRAZIIIIIIIL!

Regarding the point about making it blind or limiting it to only 2 submissions, I believe this would have a significant impact on those who are not cheating. Several athletes I’ve trained needed more verdicts to achieve first place overall, for example.

This situation is very sad. Unfortunately, it was something inevitable given the current times we are living in, but when it comes to an Olympiad, it is very harmful.

Is there a possibility of creating an environment that includes the CMS and other tools, such as open tab detection and camera/audio monitoring? The problem is that it’s already difficult to increase participation in the competition with the current model, a more technically demanding format might drive even more participants away.

I believe there might be tools focused on both technological control (I’m not sure what the possibilities are) and exam supervision (monitored by teachers), but the latter will always be more prone to failures. And, of course, there will always be ways to cheat: there might be technology that blocks or records tabs and camera, but people will still find ways to bypass the system.

It is clear to me that bringing this number down to zero is impossible, but creating mechanisms that make it easier to identify these cases would be very useful.

Is it possible to write problem statements in a way that conditions them to something personal from the contestant? For example, involving the first letter of their name or data from their state. That way, the problem statement could remain general, but if copied without analysis (I believe most people who cheat, especially in the first phase, don’t analyze anything), the AI wouldn’t process it correctly because it would need specific personal information.

Maybe limit it to one submission every 15 minutes, and only allow more frequent submissions during the last 30 minutes. I think this because people who cheat might not be willing to wait or have the patience. Or even combining this with tab, camera, and audio monitoring, this idle time could already provide evidence.

Anyway, it is indeed a great challenge. It is already difficult to expand the competition’s reach, let alone deal with this new context.