Hello, community!↵
↵
Tomorrow Codeforces Round #342 is going to take place. It will share the problemset with Moscow Olympiads in Informatics for students of grades from 6 to 9. Though, grades from 6 to 9 in Russia usually match the ages from 12 to 15, I guarantee that everyone (even Div. 1 participants) will find some interesting problems to solve. Problems were selected for you by the Moscow jury team: [user:Zlobober,2016-02-06], [user:_meshanya_,2016-02-06], [user:romanandreev,2016-02-06], Helena Andreeva and me; and prepared by members of our scientific committee: [user:wilwell,2016-02-06], [user:sender,2016-02-06], [user:iskhakovt,2016-02-06], [user:thefacetakt,2016-02-06] and [user:feldsherov,2016-02-06].↵
↵
Scoring distribution will be quite unusual: **750-750-1000-2000-3000**.↵
↵
**UPD** System testing is over. Here are the top 10:↵
↵
<ol>↵
<li> [user:_XuMuk_,2016-02-07] </li>↵
<li> [user:pandamonium,2016-02-07] </li>↵
<li> [user:latisel,2016-02-07] </li>↵
<li> [user:zetamoo,2016-02-07] </li>↵
<li> [user:yukariko,2016-02-07] </li>↵
<li> [user:I_Love_Ximera,2016-02-07] </li>↵
<li> [user:KittyLover,2016-02-07] </li>↵
<li> [user:shdut,2016-02-07] </li>↵
<li> [user:harry.zhao,2016-02-07] </li>↵
<li> [user:luke0201,2016-02-07] </li>↵
</ol>↵
↵
Congratulation! Also, problems seemed to be too tough, we should have probably made Div. 1 round. Anyway, thanks for participating, I hope you enjoyed it and learned something new!↵
↵
Thanks to [user:romanandreev,2016-02-07] for nice [analysis](http://mirror.codeforces.com/blog/entry/23342).
↵
Tomorrow Codeforces Round #342 is going to take place. It will share the problemset with Moscow Olympiads in Informatics for students of grades from 6 to 9. Though, grades from 6 to 9 in Russia usually match the ages from 12 to 15, I guarantee that everyone (even Div. 1 participants) will find some interesting problems to solve. Problems were selected for you by the Moscow jury team: [user:Zlobober,2016-02-06], [user:_meshanya_,2016-02-06], [user:romanandreev,2016-02-06], Helena Andreeva and me; and prepared by members of our scientific committee: [user:wilwell,2016-02-06], [user:sender,2016-02-06], [user:iskhakovt,2016-02-06], [user:thefacetakt,2016-02-06] and [user:feldsherov,2016-02-06].↵
↵
Scoring distribution will be quite unusual: **750-750-1000-2000-3000**.↵
↵
**UPD** System testing is over. Here are the top 10:↵
↵
<ol>↵
<li> [user:_XuMuk_,2016-02-07] </li>↵
<li> [user:pandamonium,2016-02-07] </li>↵
<li> [user:latisel,2016-02-07] </li>↵
<li> [user:zetamoo,2016-02-07] </li>↵
<li> [user:yukariko,2016-02-07] </li>↵
<li> [user:I_Love_Ximera,2016-02-07] </li>↵
<li> [user:KittyLover,2016-02-07] </li>↵
<li> [user:shdut,2016-02-07] </li>↵
<li> [user:harry.zhao,2016-02-07] </li>↵
<li> [user:luke0201,2016-02-07] </li>↵
</ol>↵
↵
Congratulation! Also, problems seemed to be too tough, we should have probably made Div. 1 round. Anyway, thanks for participating, I hope you enjoyed it and learned something new!↵
↵
Thanks to [user:romanandreev,2016-02-07] for nice [analysis](http://mirror.codeforces.com/blog/entry/23342).
