Bovmelo's blog

By Bovmelo, history, 12 months ago, In English

Let me start with “note that”.

Full text and comments »

  • Vote: I like it
  • +92
  • Vote: I do not like it

By Bovmelo, history, 2 years ago, In English

As known, 1720D1 - Xor-подпоследовательность (простая версия) has an ambiguous descriptioin. I'm the one of those who got misled during the contest. However, the misunderstood problem is solutable. Let's have a look.

It is the misunderstood version of the problem. The only difference is that in this version $$$b_i$$$ do be the subsequence of $$$a$$$, where any $$$b_i$$$ is an element of $$$a$$$. Note that $$$a_i<200$$$ remains true.

Hint 1
Hint 2
Hint 3
solution

However, I had no idea how to solve the misunderstood D2. Could anyone help me?

Full text and comments »

  • Vote: I like it
  • +29
  • Vote: I do not like it