I finish this code, but the judger says I am out of bounds, can anyone tell me why or is there anyting wrong on other places? Thanks very much.
Begged for help.
# | User | Rating |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 3947 |
2 | ecnerwala | 3654 |
3 | jiangly | 3627 |
4 | jqdai0815 | 3620 |
5 | orzdevinwang | 3612 |
6 | Benq | 3586 |
7 | Radewoosh | 3582 |
8 | Geothermal | 3569 |
8 | cnnfls_csy | 3569 |
10 | ksun48 | 3474 |
# | User | Contrib. |
---|---|---|
1 | awoo | 163 |
2 | maomao90 | 160 |
3 | adamant | 156 |
4 | atcoder_official | 153 |
5 | maroonrk | 152 |
6 | -is-this-fft- | 148 |
6 | SecondThread | 148 |
8 | Petr | 147 |
9 | nor | 145 |
10 | cry | 144 |
I finish this code, but the judger says I am out of bounds, can anyone tell me why or is there anyting wrong on other places? Thanks very much.
Begged for help.
In the official tutorial, we defined a dp[i][j] array which means that we consider 1~i and has j elements that haven't been deleted, I just want to ask if it is possible to solve it by redefined the dp: consider 1~i and has already use j moves. Could anyone tell me if my idea is possible to solve problem?
Name |
---|