In Java, why is it that the code a^=b^=a^=b does not swap the values of a and b, while in C++, such code works? For example if a=1, and b=5, in Java, after doing a^=b^=a^=b, a=0, b=1.
| № | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3792 |
| 2 | VivaciousAubergine | 3647 |
| 3 | Kevin114514 | 3611 |
| 4 | jiangly | 3583 |
| 5 | strapple | 3515 |
| 6 | tourist | 3470 |
| 7 | Radewoosh | 3415 |
| 8 | Um_nik | 3376 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 3361 |
| 10 | XVIII | 3345 |
| Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
| № | Пользователь | Вклад |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 162 |
| 2 | adamant | 148 |
| 3 | Um_nik | 146 |
| 4 | Dominater069 | 143 |
| 5 | errorgorn | 141 |
| 6 | cry | 138 |
| 7 | Proof_by_QED | 136 |
| 8 | YuukiS | 135 |
| 9 | chromate00 | 134 |
| 10 | soullless | 133 |
In Java, why is it that the code a^=b^=a^=b does not swap the values of a and b, while in C++, such code works? For example if a=1, and b=5, in Java, after doing a^=b^=a^=b, a=0, b=1.
I was trying to figure out why there is a difference in verdict in these two solutions for 1354F - Summoning Minions (summoning minions):
Solution that gives WA on test case 32 of test 2: https://pastebin.com/EzbSDw3Z
AC Solution: https://pastebin.com/DjFkheFs
The only difference between these two solutions is that when deciding whether to include one of the minions, in WA solution, I try to find max(dp[i-1][j]+minion[i].b*(k-1), dp[i-1][j-1]+minion[i].a+minion[i].b*(j-1)), which should give the actual value of the dp at that state.
On the other hand, the AC solution finds max(dp[i-1][j], dp[i-1][j-1]+minion[i].a-minion[i].b*(k-j)). I expected both methods to produce the same result, and tried to find an instance where the methods would produce different results, but I could not.
Can anyone explain why the first method causes WA?
| Название |
|---|


