flamestorm's blog

By flamestorm, 4 years ago, In English

Thanks for participating!

1692A - Marathon

Idea: mesanu

Tutorial
Solution

1692B - All Distinct

Idea: mesanu

Tutorial
Solution

1692C - Where's the Bishop?

Idea: flamestorm

Tutorial
Solution

1692D - The Clock

Idea: SlavicG

Tutorial
Solution

1692E - Binary Deque

Idea: flamestorm

Tutorial
Solution

1692F - 3SUM

Idea: flamestorm

Tutorial
Solution

1692G - 2^Sort

Idea: flamestorm

Tutorial
Solution

1692H - Gambling

Idea: mesanu

Tutorial
Solution
  • Vote: I like it
  • +48
  • Vote: I do not like it

| Write comment?
»
4 years ago, hide # |
 
Vote: I like it +6 Vote: I do not like it

Thanks for the fast editorial

»
4 years ago, hide # |
Rev. 2  
Vote: I like it +3 Vote: I do not like it
»
4 years ago, hide # |
 
Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

How to solve H without using trees?

»
4 years ago, hide # |
 
Vote: I like it +8 Vote: I do not like it

**problem H **, also can be solved useing kadane's algorithm.

»
4 years ago, hide # |
 
Vote: I like it +8 Vote: I do not like it

H can be solved in O(n) just iterating for indexes of each a that is in array. My solution is here

»
4 years ago, hide # |
 
Vote: I like it +4 Vote: I do not like it

Problem H can use Kadane in a nice way.

Notice that the sum over frequencies of distinct elements is the size of our input array.

We know any subarray endings should be at two elements that have the same value, otherwise, we are pointlessly reducing our answer and we can fix our boundaries to be on the same boundaries.

say if we have XXXLXXXRXXX where [L, R] is the subarray we are considering then there is no point in having the left or right boundaries on Xs since we could improve the sum by restoring boundaries to L and R.

We can make an array of positions for each distinct element and use the observation that the Xs can be compressed together, therefore for each distinct element, such a compression yields a size of array twice the array of all positions for that element.

So our solution boils down to making a compressed array for each distinct element and then applying kadane to it, finally taking the one which gives the maximum answer.

Time complexity is still the order of n as we are effectively applying kadane on twice the input size.

»
4 years ago, hide # |
Rev. 2  
Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Problem F : O(10^3) preprocessing + O(n) approach Submission

»
4 years ago, hide # |
 
Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

https://mirror.codeforces.com/contest/1692/submission/160650500

Here , is my submission for problem G, i didn't get how I am getting wrong answer on testcase 15, can someone please explain fault in my submission?. Thank you.

  • »
    »
    4 years ago, hide # ^ |
     
    Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    probably a floating precision error cause you are using v[i]=log2f(x)

    • »
      »
      »
      4 years ago, hide # ^ |
       
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

      is there anyway we can store log base 2 of any number upto say 20 order of precision?

      • »
        »
        »
        »
        4 years ago, hide # ^ |
         
        Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

        Depends on what you mean by "20 order of precision". If you mean just 20 digits in the number then surely double-precision floating-point can hold that amount of digits. If you mean 20 digits in fractional part, then you can't have a guarantee since it depends on how big your number is

      • »
        »
        »
        »
        4 years ago, hide # ^ |
        Rev. 2  
        Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

        Btw, you can use 63 - __buitin__clzll(x) instead of log2f(x) if you're using gcc/g++. Or you can use something like that (code below), but I'm not sure if it'll resolve your problem

        code
»
4 years ago, hide # |
Rev. 2  
Vote: I like it +22 Vote: I do not like it

Solution of H without trees

Instead of doubling and halving, consider the score of a subarray to be the difference between the frequency of $$$a$$$ and the number of elements in the subarray not equal to $$$a$$$. This is done because we will double our score for $$$freq[a]$$$ times and halve it for the rest elements and hence we want this difference to be maximum. Notice that for the best subarray, $$$a = x_l = x_r$$$. The problem can now be solved with dp. Let $$$dp[i]$$$ be the best score for a subarray with $$$l = i$$$ and $$$a = x_i$$$. Then we can see that $$$dp[i] = 1 + max(0,dp[next[a[i]]] - (next[a[i]]-i-1))$$$, where $$$next[x]$$$ is used to store the next occurence of $$$x$$$ on iterating over the dp. The right end can be maintained similarly(if the dp is maximised then $$$right[i] = right[next[a[i]]]$$$.

Submission at the time of the contest — https://mirror.codeforces.com/contest/1692/submission/160583853

»
4 years ago, hide # |
 
Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Can we use sliding window for E by searching total sum minus reqd target in the sliding window?

»
4 years ago, hide # |
 
Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Solution of H without using segment trees: https://mirror.codeforces.com/contest/1692/submission/160692781

»
4 years ago, hide # |
 
Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Could anyone help me with problem E: Binary Deque? My solution is kind of greedy. I create an array with distances (in numbers of zero entries) between two conseсutive ones. For example, for the sequence: 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1, my array is [2 3 0 1 0] (last zero means that we have tail of zeros with length 0). Next, I use two iterators for decreasing the sum of the array choosing at every step iether the head or the tail with zeros and errasing it from my array. I cannot find the mistake and 1st test is OK, but I get WA for the second. If this idea is correct then the solution is O(n). Here the link: 160692840

  • »
    »
    4 years ago, hide # ^ |
     
    Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    I have a solution of E:

    You can define an array $$$k$$$, It is prefix sum of $$$a$$$, so $$$k_i$$$ is "How many ones in [1,i]". The range [l,r]'s sum is S when $$$k_r-k_{l-1}=S$$$, you can define an array $$$m$$$. $$$m_i$$$ is "The max index j that k[j]=i". Then enumerate $$$l$$$, and the max of $$$r$$$ is $$$m_{s+k[l-1]}$$$, the answer is the minimum of $$$n-(r-l+1)$$$. If every $$$r$$$ is $$$0$$$ ($$$s+k[l-1] \gt n$$$), Then output -1. My code: 160569001

  • »
    »
    4 years ago, hide # ^ |
     
    Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    I think this logic is incorrect as this only accounts for the head or the tail. If the sum we needed was 5 and your array was [5 0 0 0 0 4 4 4 4 4], it would incorrectly assume that it should take from the tail every time instead of realizing that the 5 is better in the long run.

»
4 years ago, hide # |
 
Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Can anyone explain the Kadane algorithm approach for the H problem? I am unable to understand what one is exactly trying to do.

  • »
    »
    4 years ago, hide # ^ |
     
    Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    I've done something very similar to kadanes (with an early break when the sum reaches 0):

    For each position (starting from left) iterate through the array adding +1 for matches and -1 for other values. If the sum gets to 0 break. Any start positions that have previously added a +1 are skipped (as you've already calculated the sum from that position starting from at least 1).

»
4 years ago, hide # |
 
Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Thank you for fast editorial and interesting tasks.

»
4 years ago, hide # |
 
Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Pretty sure we can do a O(n) solution for E right? I did this. Doesn't use map stl. https://mirror.codeforces.com/contest/1692/submission/160607428

  • »
    »
    4 years ago, hide # ^ |
     
    Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it
    • »
      »
      »
      4 years ago, hide # ^ |
       
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

      can you explain the logic behind this? I also tried a 2-pointers technique but I don't think my solution works. Also, how is your solution O(n) if it has nested loops?

      • »
        »
        »
        »
        4 years ago, hide # ^ |
        Rev. 3  
        Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

        Ok I'll try.

        We're moving right pointer while sum in segment [l, r] is less/equal to s. If our sum is larger than s, we're moving the left pointer to reduce it. When sum is equal to s, update the answer. Thus, we'll find all subsegments with sum equal to s.

        Complexity is O(n) because we're moving the right pointer N times and left pointer no more than N times.

        Actually, my code is almost a copypaste of edu`s one (first block), there's a detailed explanation as well.

»
4 years ago, hide # |
 
Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Two pointers Contest :)

»
4 years ago, hide # |
 
Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

anyone please tell me where am i wrong 160716728 problem D

  • »
    »
    4 years ago, hide # ^ |
     
    Vote: I like it +16 Vote: I do not like it

    I think line 74 should be "checkhour>=24" instead of "checkhour>24"

    Also line 41~44 is not correct because the clock never shows 24:00.

»
4 years ago, hide # |
Rev. 2  
Vote: I like it +24 Vote: I do not like it

I'm not too fond of the author's solution to problem H, though the problem was great. But no divisional 4 rounds should contain any Data Structure. Here's my solution —

The basic observation is that the problem simply asks us to find, for each element(x) of the given array, the maximum subarray sum on another array(b) where b[i] = 1 if a[i] == x, -1 otherwise.

We can apply Kadane's algorithm for each element lazily. In Kadane's algorithm, the important variables are current sum, current best, and where the best subarray is. So, as we iterate over the array, we evaluate elements one by one and remember these important variables for each element and their last positions, std::map works fine.

And finally, we can just iterate over the map to find the best answer and the desired segment with the same asymptotic, O(n.log(n)). See my implementation if need be.

»
4 years ago, hide # |
 
Vote: I like it +1 Vote: I do not like it

What is the wrong on my solution Problem E ? im using two pointers to get the best distance from left and right.. 160727889

  • »
    »
    4 years ago, hide # ^ |
     
    Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    1
    12 1
    0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0
    You answer is 8 , but the correct answer should be 7. It is easy to know that this greed will not work...

»
4 years ago, hide # |
 
Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

160731775 : An Elegant solution for Problem H:no segment tree required

»
4 years ago, hide # |
 
Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Where can I find a tutorial for the standard problem of finding the maximum sum of a subarray?

»
4 years ago, hide # |
 
Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

In D, why is the second for loop running for 2022 iterations?

»
4 years ago, hide # |
Rev. 3  
Vote: I like it +16 Vote: I do not like it

An alternative solution to problem H without segment tree. Notice that if we choose $$$(a,l,r)$$$, the money we will get is $$$2^{x-(r-l+1-x)}\ =2^{2x-(r-l)+1}\ $$$ ($$$x$$$ is the number of times that $$$ a $$$ appears in round $$$l$$$ to round $$$r$$$). Thus our goal is maximizing $$$2x-(r-l)+1$$$. For a certain number $$$a'$$$, we can create an array $$$b$$$, where $$$b[i]=-i+$$$ $$$2\times$$$(the number of times that $$$ a' $$$ appears in round $$$1$$$ to round $$$i$$$). And the money we will get by choosing $$$(a',l,r)$$$ is equal to $$$2^{2x-(r-l)+1}=2^{b[r]-b[l]+1}\ $$$! On the other hand, it's obviously that if the answer is $$$(a,l,r)$$$, then the dice must show $$$a$$$ in both round $$$l$$$ and round $$$r$$$. Therefore, we only need to consider the rounds where dice show $$$a'$$$ for a certain number $$$a'$$$. Based on the above, the problem can now be solved with time complexity $$$ \mathcal{O}(nlogn)$$$ by using maps and arrays. Checks this code for better comprehension:https://mirror.codeforces.com/contest/1692/submission/160769341

»
4 years ago, hide # |
 
Vote: I like it -9 Vote: I do not like it

when div5 begins to be held? I want a more easier division!

»
4 years ago, hide # |
 
Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

mesanu For Problem H, can you explain how you are updating and calculating the maximum sum subarray having elements -1, 1, and like how you are updating it in log(N). Like in your code what does pref, suf, Val, and sum store, and how your modify function is working as I'm having trouble with these parts. Thank you.

»
4 years ago, hide # |
 
Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Here's another approach to problem H which is very surprising for me. We can just make store all positions of each distinct value. Then apply the Kadane's algorithm to find the leftmost and the rightmost of each local maximum power of 2. Lastly, just find the maximum of them. Here's the code to what I'm saying: https://mirror.codeforces.com/contest/1692/submission/161122830

»
4 years ago, hide # |
Rev. 2  
Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

[Deleted]

»
4 years ago, hide # |
 
Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Greedy Approach for last question : Gambling ->

Suppose we have this example :

10 
8 8 8 9 9 6 6 9 6 6

First make map< long long , vector> and insert key : [with vector of indexes]

8 : [0,1,2]
9 : [3,4,7]
6 : [5,6,8,9]

then iterate over vector of indexes of each element Initialize res = 1 ( represent power of 2. Initially 1 because for one occurrence we have 1*2)

for 8 : res = 1 ( index 0 )
start iterating from : index 1 
   if gap>0
   subtract gap ( res -= gap (here gap is 0) )
   and add +1 ( for current occurrence )

   index 2 : gap is zero
   so just add +1

   we get res = 3
   this means final money is pow(2,3) = 8

   if at any moment res become <= 0 then set res =1 again (as this is minimum value possible)
Do this for all and record max res

CODE

#include <bits/stdc++.h>
using namespace std;
using namespace chrono;
#define ll              long long
#define pb              push_back
#define For(i,n)        for(int i=0; i<n; i++)
#define Fora(i,a,b)     for(int i=a; i<b; i++)

void solve(){

   ll n;cin>>n;
   vector<ll>v(n);
   For(i,n)cin>>v[i];
   map<ll,vli>m;
   For(i,n){
        m[ v[i] ].pb(i);
   }
   ll a = v[0] , l = 1, r = 1;
   double sum = 1;

   for(auto itr : m){
        vli temp = itr.second;    
        ll siz = temp.size();        
        double res = 1;
        ll start = temp[0];
        Fora(i,1,siz){
            ll gap = (temp[i]-(temp[i-1]))-1 ;
            res -= gap;
            res ++ ;
            if(res>sum){            
                sum = res;
                a = itr.first;
                l = start+1;
                r = temp[i]+1;
            }            
            if(res<1){
                start = temp[i];
                res = 1;
            }            
        }        
   }
   cout<<a<<" "<<l<<" "<<r;

}
int main() {
    int t; 
    cin>>t;
    while(t--){
       solve();
      cout<<endl;
    }
    return 0;}
»
4 years ago, hide # |
Rev. 3  
Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

hi

»
4 years ago, hide # |
 
Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Another div4 is coming soon

»
4 years ago, hide # |
 
Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Will participate in next div4

»
12 months ago, hide # |
 
Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

for H problem one can use kadane simply for implementation check my soln

»
10 months ago, hide # |
 
Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Why no one talking about F being called 3sum

»
10 months ago, hide # |
 
Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

For H, notice that if we want to reserve $$$k$$$ elements in the cnter, we should have at least $$$2^k-1$$$ numbers, so we can implement it by brute force.

Consider when we want to reserve two numbers, for example, one 1 and one 2, we should first insert two 1s and then insert a 2, which will elimate the number of 1 by 1. Samely, to reserve one 1, one 2 and one 3 in the cnter, we need four 1s, two 2s, and one 3. The same goes at four numbers, five, and more.

As a result, brute force implementation has a complexity of $$$O(n\log(n))$$$ if we use a hash table, or $$$ O(n\log^2(n))$$$ if we use an ordered map.

Implementation
»
9 months ago, hide # |
 
Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Problem G — Good Problem 335403186

»
5 months ago, hide # |
 
Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Hey guys I think that problem E can be solved in a simpler manner if we try different approach like finding the maximum length Sum that equals with s for that we can use a prefix sum technique and to return the answer the minimum operation would be n-maxlen(s)

t = int(input())

for _ in range(t):
    n, s = map(int,input().split())
    a = list(map(int,input().split()))

    hashMap = {0:-1}
    maxLen, Sum, cnt = 0, 0, 0
    for i in range(n):
        Sum += a[i]
        if Sum - s in hashMap:
            cnt = i-hashMap[Sum-s]
        hashMap[Sum] = hashMap.get(Sum,i)
        maxLen = max(cnt,maxLen)
        cnt+=1
    
    if Sum < s:
        print(-1)
        continue
    print(n-maxLen)