Can anybody explain me how to solve E using binnary search(I can`t understand editorial)
| № | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3792 |
| 2 | VivaciousAubergine | 3647 |
| 3 | Kevin114514 | 3603 |
| 4 | jiangly | 3583 |
| 5 | strapple | 3515 |
| 6 | tourist | 3470 |
| 7 | dXqwq | 3436 |
| 8 | Radewoosh | 3415 |
| 9 | Otomachi_Una | 3413 |
| 10 | Um_nik | 3376 |
| Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
| № | Пользователь | Вклад |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 158 |
| 2 | adamant | 152 |
| 3 | Proof_by_QED | 146 |
| 3 | Um_nik | 146 |
| 5 | Dominater069 | 144 |
| 6 | errorgorn | 141 |
| 7 | cry | 139 |
| 8 | YuukiS | 135 |
| 9 | chromate00 | 134 |
| 9 | TheScrasse | 134 |
| Название |
|---|



Note: I use 1-indexing and a translator.
Idea: let's go through all possible subarrays [i..j], and if sum of elements is equal to s, then recalculate the answer: ans = min(ans, i — 1 + n — j) — that is, we need to remove (i — 1) elements from the beginning and (n — j) from the end.
This is O(n^2), we can improve with binary search:
Let's count the prefix sums in the array a, and go through j. Then we need to find the leftmost i so that (a[j] — a[i — 1]) == s, in other words, find the leftmost (a[j] — s) in the prefix-sum array. Then the answer is recalculated in the same way as in the case of O(n^2).
Now O(n log n).
My solution: link
Why downvotes? I only help with solution!
thanks very much :) You realy help me bro)