| № | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3792 |
| 2 | VivaciousAubergine | 3647 |
| 3 | Kevin114514 | 3603 |
| 4 | jiangly | 3583 |
| 5 | turmax | 3559 |
| 6 | tourist | 3541 |
| 7 | strapple | 3515 |
| 8 | ksun48 | 3461 |
| 9 | dXqwq | 3436 |
| 10 | Otomachi_Una | 3413 |
| Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
| № | Пользователь | Вклад |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 157 |
| 2 | adamant | 153 |
| 3 | Um_nik | 147 |
| 4 | Proof_by_QED | 146 |
| 5 | Dominater069 | 145 |
| 6 | errorgorn | 142 |
| 7 | cry | 139 |
| 8 | YuukiS | 135 |
| 9 | TheScrasse | 134 |
| 10 | chromate00 | 133 |
Nowadays cf usually use multiple testcases instead of multiple samples to decrease competitor's sample-test-time or due to other reason.
But some problems can't use multiple testcases(such as 1743D - Problem with Random Tests) and a friend of mine get penalties because of Wrong answer on test(sample) 2/3.
Can MikeMirzayanov fix it, or it is just cf feature?
It's the cf rule.
But I think sample #1 and sample #2/#3 are equal so what does this cf rule target at...?
I like to believe that it targets accidental submissions. Also you can try agnocpeed to test multiple test cases at once :)
But I have been accustomed to CCH and CP-Editor and I don't want to try agnocpeed though it seems powerful XD
My opinion is that, the rule is to pretend wrong submissions across problems, for example I want to submit a problem C solution but I missubmitted it to problem B.
But if you can pass the first sample, you are not submitting the wrong problem, are you?
You do have a point.