# | User | Rating |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 3985 |
2 | jiangly | 3814 |
3 | jqdai0815 | 3682 |
4 | Benq | 3529 |
5 | orzdevinwang | 3526 |
6 | ksun48 | 3517 |
7 | Radewoosh | 3410 |
8 | hos.lyric | 3399 |
9 | ecnerwala | 3392 |
9 | Um_nik | 3392 |
# | User | Contrib. |
---|---|---|
1 | cry | 169 |
2 | maomao90 | 162 |
2 | Um_nik | 162 |
4 | atcoder_official | 161 |
5 | djm03178 | 158 |
6 | -is-this-fft- | 157 |
7 | adamant | 155 |
8 | awoo | 154 |
8 | Dominater069 | 154 |
10 | luogu_official | 150 |
Name |
---|
Hi I am not sure if I am the right person to answer all your queries, but I will still try to answer them to the best of my knowledge, hopefully someone can correct me if I am wrong somewhere.
We were inspired by something similar that has been done with IOI archives as well.
Problem statements, tests(up to 2019-20) are already there. Solutions for most problems can also be obtained from ranklists itself. For testcases which aren't there, we considered 2 things:
a. we request some respectable CPers to help us out
b. we make a github repo where community could add issues for weak tests
CF has also had Hashcode type contests in the past, so maybe we could include them here in a similar manner as well. Afaik Hashcode data-sets are already available, so added plus.
I think writing scorers for Hash Code is quite a non-trivial task (and sometimes it might need a ton of computational resources, or the scorers for each subtask might be different). Do you know of a way to access all contest materials from the Hash Code side of things rather than writing things from scratch?
(un)rolling hash code 😔
AHC is directly inspired by topcoder's marathons.
While I agree with the sentiment that everything should be preserved. Especially the results. It's worth noting that HashCode problems are of a really bad quality and their educational value is next to none. Marathons/AHCs are way more useful. Sadly, marathons are already not preserved considering old marathons are inaccessible (including problem statements, results, solutions and forum posts).
Apologies for the misattribution, I had totally forgotten about marathons. Unfortunately I have never competed in one (and can say the same about a lot of other Hash Code participants), so Hash Code was the starting point for me and some tutorials that I remember seeing on related topics.
Thanks for the reference by the way — from your comment it seems that it is a good idea to also dig up old marathons by coordinating with the topcoder staff/authors.
Google owns Kaggle and was supposed to store old Hashcode contests there, I recall. That would be nice.
Thanks for having the same idea as my blog idea and representing it in a better way. Ofcourse people prefer some master posting this rather than a newbie! :cry: (referring to : https://mirror.codeforces.com/blog/entry/113194) But since this blog will do the same work, I am happy.
I didn't know about your blog, it seems we wrote about it at the same time. Given that the difference in publishing time was just 8 minutes, and that I had to collect all relevant links and list out all possible issues, it should be clear imo.
Anyway, I am glad to see that there are others who feel the same way.