?
# | User | Rating |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 3985 |
2 | jiangly | 3814 |
3 | jqdai0815 | 3682 |
4 | Benq | 3529 |
5 | orzdevinwang | 3526 |
6 | ksun48 | 3517 |
7 | Radewoosh | 3410 |
8 | hos.lyric | 3399 |
9 | ecnerwala | 3392 |
9 | Um_nik | 3392 |
# | User | Contrib. |
---|---|---|
1 | cry | 169 |
2 | maomao90 | 162 |
2 | Um_nik | 162 |
4 | atcoder_official | 161 |
5 | djm03178 | 158 |
6 | -is-this-fft- | 157 |
7 | adamant | 155 |
8 | awoo | 154 |
8 | Dominater069 | 154 |
10 | luogu_official | 150 |
Name |
---|
No, you can't. However, if you use ordered set, you can do this in $$$O(log(N))$$$
No, it is not possible to calculate std::distance() for iterators in std::set with O(N) complexity. The reason for this is that std::set is implemented as a balanced binary search tree, which means that the elements are stored in a non-contiguous order. As a result, the distance between two iterators in a std::set can only be calculated by traversing the tree from one iterator to the other, which takes O(log n) time complexity, where n is the number of elements in the set. Therefore, std::distance() for iterators in std::set has a worst-case time complexity of O(log n).
no lol iterator traversal on
std::set
is $$$O(\text{distance})$$$, so basically this is $$$O(N)$$$You can use
__gnu_pbds::tree
and set node update totree_order_statistics_node_update
.After that just call
order_of_key
to find distance between two elements in $$$O(\log N)$$$ time.For
std::set<Key,Compare,Allocator>::iterator
, it is mentioned in https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/iterator/distance that its time complexity is linear. Not sure if we could do better asstd::set<>
is too packaged.it is impossible to get distance or indicies in a set in less than O(N) time, however using the ordered set data structure can do this in O(log N) time.
https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/ordered-set-gnu-c-pbds/