If you want a variable to be the negative of itself, do you use n = -n, n *= -1, or other methods? If so, suggest some methods down below.
| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3792 |
| 2 | VivaciousAubergine | 3647 |
| 3 | jiangly | 3631 |
| 4 | Kevin114514 | 3574 |
| 5 | maroonrk | 3521 |
| 6 | strapple | 3515 |
| 7 | Radewoosh | 3461 |
| 8 | tourist | 3428 |
| 9 | turmax | 3378 |
| 10 | Um_nik | 3376 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 162 |
| 2 | adamant | 148 |
| 3 | Um_nik | 146 |
| 4 | Dominater069 | 143 |
| 5 | errorgorn | 140 |
| 6 | cry | 138 |
| 7 | Proof_by_QED | 136 |
| 8 | YuukiS | 135 |
| 9 | chromate00 | 134 |
| 10 | soullless | 133 |
If you want a variable to be the negative of itself, do you use n = -n, n *= -1, or other methods? If so, suggest some methods down below.
| Name |
|---|



Why does it matter too much?
It's a serious debate, as the title of the blog says
n = n*(6968-6969)
lol,
How about
n = ~n?n = binary_exponentiate(-1,69)*n
n=+-nis the best