| № | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | tourist | 4009 |
| 2 | jiangly | 3823 |
| 3 | Benq | 3738 |
| 4 | Radewoosh | 3633 |
| 5 | jqdai0815 | 3620 |
| 6 | orzdevinwang | 3529 |
| 7 | ecnerwala | 3446 |
| 8 | Um_nik | 3396 |
| 9 | ksun48 | 3390 |
| 10 | gamegame | 3386 |
| Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
| № | Пользователь | Вклад |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | cry | 167 |
| 2 | Um_nik | 163 |
| 3 | maomao90 | 162 |
| 3 | atcoder_official | 162 |
| 5 | adamant | 159 |
| 6 | -is-this-fft- | 158 |
| 7 | awoo | 157 |
| 8 | TheScrasse | 154 |
| 9 | Dominater069 | 153 |
| 9 | nor | 153 |
Recently I really got disheartened by seeing some code written by redcoders. Why they write POSH style code which nobody understands or at least hard to understand instantly? Is that really necessary?
can you understand this for loop in one go?
for(i=(B<2?2-B:0); i<res; ++i){
I think no.
sir, I'm so sorry.
Next time when I write code I will remember you and I won't use any ternary operators. Doesn't matter if I have to waste time writing longer code. After all, the only thing that's important is how aesthetically pleasing it is for you.
Please forgive me
What's posh code
Downvoted, what's wrong with this loop?