Vladosiya's blog

By Vladosiya, history, 3 years ago, translation, In English

1881A - Don't Try to Count

Idea: Vladosiya

Tutorial
Solution

1881B - Three Threadlets

Idea: Gornak40

Tutorial
Solution

1881C - Perfect Square

Idea: myav, MikeMirzayanov, Vladosiya

Tutorial
Solution

1881D - Divide and Equalize

Idea: myav

Tutorial
Solution

1881E - Block Sequence

Idea: MikeMirzayanov

Tutorial
Solution

1881F - Minimum Maximum Distance

Idea: ibraevdmitriy

Tutorial
Solution

1881G - Anya and the Mysterious String

Idea: Gornak40

Tutorial
Solution
  • Vote: I like it
  • +26
  • Vote: I do not like it

| Write comment?
»
3 years ago, hide # |
 
Vote: I like it +12 Vote: I do not like it

I just have a question: Why is the algorithm for F correct? What's the intuition behind it?

  • »
    »
    3 years ago, hide # ^ |
     
    Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    Its like diameter of the tree and you want to get a point in the middle of it you can say as a centroid

    • »
      »
      »
      3 years ago, hide # ^ |
       
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

      Yes, I know, but we essentially don't care about which nodes are marked and which ones are not.

      • »
        »
        »
        »
        3 years ago, hide # ^ |
         
        Vote: I like it +2 Vote: I do not like it

        Assume the tree is rooted at a marked node. If you are at the deepest marked node on a branch and move further down that branch it will increase the distances to all marked nodes by 1 (meaning the value of that node will be greater than the marked node you came from). You can therefore remove any nodes past the deepest marked node on each branch. From this it follows that you have a tree where all the leaves are marked and at that point it's the standard algorithm for finding the largest distance from a leaf.

        • »
          »
          »
          »
          »
          3 years ago, hide # ^ |
           
          Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

          can't we do it with rerooting?

          • »
            »
            »
            »
            »
            »
            3 years ago, hide # ^ |
            Rev. 2  
            Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

            I actually did it with rerooting, with lazy segment tree. You can check out my submission 227869909 .

            • »
              »
              »
              »
              »
              »
              »
              3 years ago, hide # ^ |
               
              Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

              There is no need for a lazy segment tree to do the rerooting.

            • »
              »
              »
              »
              »
              »
              »
              3 years ago, hide # ^ |
              Rev. 5  
              Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

              My rerooting with prefix and suffix sum. It is really a bit too more complicated, so I missed the first AK in div 3 (got AC after the contest 12min later, because of a little afraid of TLE by NodeJS). https://mirror.codeforces.com/contest/1881/submission/227927645

              The first DFS will calculate 3 kinds of values,

              • dp[u], the max length from u to a marked node under u's subtree

              • prefix[u][j], the max length from u to a marked node under u's [0,j] children's subtree

              • suffix[u][j], the max length from u to a marked node under u's [j,] children's subtree

              The second DFS is rerooting. For each u, its answer can be calculated by two parts,

              • dp[u], to nodes under u's subtree

              • out, to nodes not under u's subtree

              When rerooting from u to v, out is updated by 3 parts. All of them should increase 1 if necessary.

              • u's out

              • u itself

              • max(prefix[u][j-1], suffix[u][j+1]), with v is u's jth child

              Hope above can help you improve understanding of rerooting, even this problem is not the best application to be solved.

  • »
    »
    3 years ago, hide # ^ |
     
    Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    F can also be done in a similar fashion to Tree Distances

    Submission for Tree Distances

    Solution for CF: 227871270

    • »
      »
      »
      3 years ago, hide # ^ |
       
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

      Exactly! Problem F can be considered as the special case of this one. 227869702 Here's mine with a slightly different approach.

    • »
      »
      »
      21 month(s) ago, hide # ^ |
       
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

      Can you please explain this part in your code

      		if(!distante.empty() && (distante.back()).second == vecin)
      		{
      			if(distante.size() >= 2)
      			{
      				int poz = distante.size() - 2;
      				dfs2(nod, vecin, max(dist, distante[poz].first) + 1);
      			}
      			else
      				dfs2(nod, vecin, dist + 1);
      		}
      		else
      			if(!distante.empty())	
      				dfs2(nod, vecin, max(distante.back().first, dist) + 1);
      			else
      				dfs2(nod, vecin, dist + 1);
      
      • »
        »
        »
        »
        21 month(s) ago, hide # ^ |
         
        Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

        Yes, this code is one of my older ones where I used Romanian names for various variables

        distance = distances, an array which stores for each vertex the maximum distances to leaves vecin = next node (literal translation is neighbor) nod = node

        Basically if you have at least two children, you don't want to visit the same path which gave you the best answer, I have a video where I explain this in more detail.

    • »
      »
      »
      21 month(s) ago, hide # ^ |
      Rev. 2  
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

      278260829

      can you please help why this solution of mine fails. I tried to implement the method explained in your video

»
3 years ago, hide # |
 
Vote: I like it +17 Vote: I do not like it

"the author is lazy"

Pretty obvious from the way this editorial is written

»
3 years ago, hide # |
 
Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

For problem 1881F - Minimum Maximum Distance , can someone please tell the proof why it is always true to consider the longest distance between the labelled vertex and then divide it by 2 then take ceil of it.

After considering some examples it becomes somehow convincing but not very intutive about why that condition will always be true.

  • »
    »
    3 years ago, hide # ^ |
    Rev. 2  
    Vote: I like it +11 Vote: I do not like it

    Define $$$dist(i,j)$$$ as the distance between node $$$i$$$ and node $$$j$$$.

    Assume that there are $$$3$$$ labelled vertices $$$a,b,c$$$ and $$$(a,b)$$$ is the pair that creates longest distance from two labelled vertices. To find the node position that makes the minimum value of maximum distance to either $$$a$$$ or $$$b$$$, ofc we choose the node (call this node $$$d$$$) that resides in the middle of the path from $$$a$$$ to $$$b$$$ (since if without loss of generality we assume $$$dist(d,a) \leq dist(d,b)$$$, then $$$dist(d,b) = \bigg\lceil\frac{dist(a,b)}{2}\bigg\rceil$$$ is the maximum from both and this is the min value of $$$dist(d,b)$$$).

    Now, suppose $$$dist(d,c) \gt \max(dist(d,a),dist(d,b))$$$. Then, the longest distance from two labelled vertices must be the pair $$$(c,a)$$$ or $$$(c,b)$$$ (since $$$dist(d,c)+dist(d,b) \gt dist(d,a)+dist(d,b)$$$ and $$$dist(d,c)+dist(d,a) \gt dist(d,b)+dist(d,a)$$$) which results in contradiction.

»
3 years ago, hide # |
 
Vote: I like it -12 Vote: I do not like it

C was the coolest one and it's not even close

  • »
    »
    3 years ago, hide # ^ |
     
    Vote: I like it +3 Vote: I do not like it

    bruh I felt that G was much more interesting than all the problems(despite me tryping 11 attempts to AC G)

»
3 years ago, hide # |
 
Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Starters were bad(ABC) but the main course was good(DEF) but i am not able to understand the bill(editorial)

  • »
    »
    3 years ago, hide # ^ |
     
    Vote: I like it +1 Vote: I do not like it

    tru, i dont really enjoy ABC this round. DE was kinda meh for me. FG was quite interesting to play around with

    • »
      »
      »
      2 years ago, hide # ^ |
       
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

      can you explain to me why in E we are updating dp[i] as

      dp[i]=min(dp[i+1]+1,dp[i+a[i]+1]) and not as

      dp[i]=min(dp[i+1]+1,dp[i+a[i]+1+j]+j) for all j st i+a[i]+1+j<n indexing from 0.

      • »
        »
        »
        »
        2 years ago, hide # ^ |
        Rev. 3  
        Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

        Depends on how you define your DP. My design was that dp[i] = minimum removals I can have after considering all the values from [i, n — 1].

        Case 1: We don't take the current index.

        That means that we will need to remove this index. So, dp[i] = min(dp[i], dp[i + 1] + 1).

        Case 2: Take the current block.

        That means that we will need to remove all the values from [i, i + a[i] + 1]. So, dp[i] = min(dp[i], dp[i + a[i] + 1]). Need to make sure it is not out of bound. You can only end up at i + a[i] + 1, nowhere else.

        • »
          »
          »
          »
          »
          2 years ago, hide # ^ |
           
          Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

          I am saying that when you take the current block, it means you will take a[i] number of elements with you and then consider the next block. So I am saying that we pop some more values before taking the a[i] values and it can land us an even better solution. Thats y i am checking for all j possible

»
3 years ago, hide # |
 
Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Task D

If we assumed 1s can calculate 10^8 times, but in the worst condition(all a are equal to 999983), it will judge near 2000(t)*10^4(n)*10^3 times. Would it TLE?

I am a novice and thank you for your generous advice and point out my mistakes.

»
3 years ago, hide # |
Rev. 3  
Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

https://ideone.com/lyUPEZ

problem F c++ BFS code: why RTE on test 3 ???

  • »
    »
    3 years ago, hide # ^ |
    Rev. 9  
    Vote: I like it +3 Vote: I do not like it

    Ok let me show some potential improvements of your code:

    Why you are wrong: You missed out the corner case (n=1) where deg[1]=0 meaning your "start" is undefined and therefore shows runtime error. Meanwhile, the solution is wrong(after I tested it with the fixed code).

    Data Structures used: You dont need to push the k values into a set instead use a boolean vector or smt. set requires O(nlogn) which means you will waste precious time if you are using set.

    Your code checks if the root is in the set and the adjacent elements as well, you can generalise it by putting it after int node=q.front(); q.pop(); if(bla bla bla) mdis.push_back(...). You can save some lines of code.

    You can try learning how to write functions such as function<void(int)> bfs=[&](int root){ code here}; this allows you to write the function inside your main fucntion where you dont need to pass all the arrays and stuff. You can access it inside the function. This should save you some implementation time as well.

    Your code is not very clean (for a guy like me), therefore hard to read. I saw some parts of the code that has strange spacing. I used to be a template monster with around 400 lines of templates, but I find it hard to debug if I write a code with lots of shortforms(for some reason). I recommend spending sometime either looking at other people's code and learning a neater way of writing it. I'm not pinelizing you, just giving some personal suggestions

    Neater and fixed code(although it is wrong): Sorry that I deleted the front part of your code.

    code is here: https://ideone.com/fN9WEY

»
3 years ago, hide # |
 
Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

I lost the top 150 due to hacking task D :(

»
3 years ago, hide # |
 
Vote: I like it +3 Vote: I do not like it

Simple and insightful Video Editorials for A-E.

»
3 years ago, hide # |
Rev. 4  
Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Why is my code for incorrect? I feel like it closely resembles the intended idea. It's prob D. Please help me My code

»
3 years ago, hide # |
 
Vote: I like it +7 Vote: I do not like it

For F, It's always better to re-construct the tree like this.

Tree

It's related to tree diameter (I guess there's no formal proof but this blog will help Blog)

»
3 years ago, hide # |
 
Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Can anyone please explain how does D solution works? Can't able understand how counting frequency of prime divisors gives our answer.

  • »
    »
    3 years ago, hide # ^ |
    Rev. 2  
    Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    Let's use two ideas:

    1) Every number can be represented as a product of prime numbers (= prime divisors). This is known as factorization.

    2) If two numbers are equal, they have the same set of prime divisors.

    So, the operation in the problem allows you to "take" one prime divisor from a[i] and "give" it to a[j].

    If, after doing this operation several times, we can rearrange the divisors so that every number in the array has the same set of divisors, then the answer is YES.

    To check that this is possible, we can simply count the number of occurrences of each divisor in the products.

    For example, consider test case 4:

    4

    30 50 27 20

    30 = 2 * 3 * 5

    50 = 2 * 5 * 5

    27 = 3 * 3 * 3

    20 = 2 * 2 * 5

    We have four occurrences of "5", four occurrences of "3" and four occurrences of "2". By doing the operation several times, we can turn each number into 2*3*5.

»
3 years ago, hide # |
 
Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Only AC 1 problem... f**k me

»
3 years ago, hide # |
 
Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

If someone prefers video explanations or interested in knowing how to think in a live contest or reach to a particular solution.
Here is my live Screencast of solving problems [A -> E] (with detailed commentary in Hindi language).

»
3 years ago, hide # |
 
Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Can G solved with sqrt-decomposition?, I'm getting WA2 Code

  • »
    »
    3 years ago, hide # ^ |
     
    Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    I think it shoud be fine, WA means your code has some errors not TLE. But im pretty sure if your code has a large constant factor with sqrt-decomposition, your code might TLE

    • »
      »
      »
      3 years ago, hide # ^ |
       
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

      Yup I know, I just wanted tye TLE verdict not the WA one to make sure that my idea is correct.

      • »
        »
        »
        »
        3 years ago, hide # ^ |
         
        Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

        Erm i also got many wa2(you can see from my submissions) I had many WA2 because I even pushed l into my valid answers when s[l-2]==s[l] but actually its invalid. If l is in the set meaning s[l]==s[l+2]. So check if your program has valid answers correctly. Also similarly for r with r+1 and r+2. r-1 with r+1.

»
3 years ago, hide # |
 
Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

the editorial is short and to the point!!

»
3 years ago, hide # |
Rev. 2  
Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

.

»
3 years ago, hide # |
Rev. 3  
Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Problem F solutions are based on the tree diameter, It takes some greedy proofs but in the end you can convert the problem to a direct tree diameter problem. Here's a blog

»
3 years ago, hide # |
 
Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Any one Feels that this contest was not for Div.3 ?

It seems to be Harder :(

»
3 years ago, hide # |
 
Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

How do I solve 1881G - Anya and the Mysterious String with Segment tree using Lazy propogation? This is what I've done 227967016, I haven't used Lazy propogation and it's TLE. Thank you in advance.

»
3 years ago, hide # |
 
Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Why this code doesn't work for problem D?

code
»
3 years ago, hide # |
 
Vote: I like it +4 Vote: I do not like it

I feel it was really a nice contest for anyone starting out on cp in the sense that it offers a good mix of adhoc and dsa

»
3 years ago, hide # |
 
Vote: I like it +3 Vote: I do not like it

f can be solved using dp Let define d(v) as the max distance from vertex v to a labeled vertex in its subtree and define g(v) as the max distance from vertex v to a labeled vertex which is not in the subtree of v then d(v)=max(d(child of v)+1), g(v)=max(g(parent of v)+1,d(sibling of v) + 2) then f(v)=max(d(v),g(v))

»
3 years ago, hide # |
Rev. 2  
Vote: I like it +3 Vote: I do not like it

F is similar to

The only change is to fix the end points of the diameter as RED nodes.

»
3 years ago, hide # |
 
Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

I did rerooting for F, would've gotten top 100 or something but I had to have a typo that I didn't see

»
3 years ago, hide # |
 
Vote: I like it +1 Vote: I do not like it

I have two nicer(?) solutions than the official ones.

B: Suppose everything has length $$$l$$$ in the end. Then $$$l \mid A$$$, $$$l \mid B$$$, $$$l \mid C$$$ (proof: run the splitting apart in reverse). This is also sufficient, and uses $$$\frac{A}{l} + \frac{B}{l} + \frac{C}{l} - 3$$$ operations. The number of operations is minimised when $$$l$$$ is maximum, so $$$l := \gcd(A, B, C)$$$; to solve the problem just check if the minimum is at most 3. 228383697

(I saw a lot of people at the top of unofficial standings iterating over $$$(A + B + C) / l$$$ and testing each of them using this condition; it's quite strange to me that they didn't use GCD instead...)

G: There is no need for Fenwick trees or segment trees, you can check palindromes using just the difference array (and maintain bad positions using std::set as in the tutorial). 228383431

»
3 years ago, hide # |
 
Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Can someone Please help me with the problem F . My code 228434471 is giving wrong answer at Test 4.

»
3 years ago, hide # |
 
Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Problem G with sets and vectors is also possible submission

»
3 years ago, hide # |
 
Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Can anybody can tell me whether my solution in F can use when it have the edge-weight?Can it be called DP?228766385

»
3 years ago, hide # |
 
Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Can someone explain what does this mean ~ Notice that palindromes do not appear or disappear inside a segment, but they can appear or disappear at its boundaries

»
2 years ago, hide # |
 
Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

G can also be solved only with segment tree. In each node we keep track of the first two characters in the interval as well as the last two (or just one character if its a leaf). Then when we merge two intervals we just keep check if a palindrome is formed at the edges. Updates can also be handled very simply by just applying the shift operation to the characters we keep track of. AC with this idea: https://mirror.codeforces.com/contest/1881/submission/240931303

»
2 years ago, hide # |
 
Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

can you explain to me why in E we are updating dp[i] as

dp[i]=min(dp[i+1]+1,dp[i+a[i]+1]) and not as

dp[i]=min(dp[i+1]+1,dp[i+a[i]+1+j]+j) for all j st i+a[i]+1+j<n indexing from 0

»
22 months ago, hide # |
 
Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

can some body explain d part

»
11 months ago, hide # |
 
Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

editorial not loading for F problem

showing "Unable to parse markup [type=CF_MATHJAX]"