Monotonic Stacks:

• Excel at:
  • Finding next greater or smaller elements in arrays
  • Tracking maximum/minimum values within a sliding window
  • Solving problems involving range queries with certain restrictions
• Operations:
  • Push, pop, peek, find next greater/smaller element
• Time complexity: Typically O(1) for operations, but can involve upfront processing
• Space complexity: Usually O(n)

Segment Trees:

• Excel at:
  • Range queries (sum, minimum, maximum, etc.)
  • Range updates (adding/subtracting values within ranges)
  • Solving problems involving range operations efficiently
• Operations:
  • Query for information within a range
  • Update values within a range
• Time complexity: Typically O(log n) for queries and updates
• Space complexity: O(n)

When to Choose:

• Monotonic stack: Use for problems involving finding next greater/smaller elements, sliding window maximum/minimum, or range queries with specific conditions where a stack-like structure is naturally suited.
• Segment tree: Use for problems involving general range queries, range updates, or efficient range-based operations that don't align well with a stack's structure.

Key Considerations:

• Implementation complexity: Monotonic stacks are generally simpler to implement than segment trees.
• Code readability: Monotonic stacks often lead to more readable code for problems they are well-suited for.
• Performance trade-offs: In some cases, segment trees might offer faster queries at the cost of increased space usage.

In summary:

• While segment trees can be used to solve certain problems that monotonic stacks can, they are not universally interchangeable.
• The choice depends on the specific problem requirements and the trade-offs between implementation complexity, code readability, and performance.

What do you think need to be changed ?