| № | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | tourist | 4009 |
| 2 | jiangly | 3823 |
| 3 | Benq | 3738 |
| 4 | Radewoosh | 3633 |
| 5 | jqdai0815 | 3620 |
| 6 | orzdevinwang | 3529 |
| 7 | ecnerwala | 3446 |
| 8 | Um_nik | 3396 |
| 9 | ksun48 | 3390 |
| 10 | gamegame | 3386 |
| Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
| № | Пользователь | Вклад |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | cry | 166 |
| 2 | maomao90 | 163 |
| 2 | Um_nik | 163 |
| 4 | atcoder_official | 161 |
| 5 | adamant | 159 |
| 6 | -is-this-fft- | 158 |
| 7 | awoo | 157 |
| 8 | TheScrasse | 154 |
| 9 | nor | 153 |
| 9 | Dominater069 | 153 |
hi :)
is it possible make all this operations with BIT?
1- add(l, r, val) >add a[l..r] value of val
2- sum(l, r) >calculate sum of a[l..r]
I thought it is impossible until saw this comment
I didn't understand it correctly :( can anybody explain the approach:)
Tks a lot
Yes. http://petr-mitrichev.blogspot.ru/2013/05/fenwick-tree-range-updates.html
Yep, as adamant has posted it is possible. However in my opinion its much better to just be comfortable using a segment tree, after a bit of practice they really aren't complicated and don't take very long to write.