| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3792 |
| 2 | VivaciousAubergine | 3647 |
| 3 | Kevin114514 | 3603 |
| 4 | jiangly | 3583 |
| 5 | turmax | 3559 |
| 6 | tourist | 3541 |
| 7 | strapple | 3515 |
| 8 | ksun48 | 3461 |
| 9 | dXqwq | 3436 |
| 10 | Otomachi_Una | 3413 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 157 |
| 2 | adamant | 153 |
| 3 | Um_nik | 147 |
| 3 | Proof_by_QED | 147 |
| 5 | Dominater069 | 145 |
| 6 | errorgorn | 142 |
| 7 | cry | 139 |
| 8 | YuukiS | 135 |
| 9 | TheScrasse | 134 |
| 10 | chromate00 | 133 |
| Name |
|---|



Yes, the same thing was happened in my case.
But, you should have optimized the code, as you are taking input 3 x 10^6 numbers!
Your code gets AC without fastio: 267774400 (pikachu shocked emote)
Using scanf and printf is again an optimisation that does not compliment testing the logic of the code
I do not think you have a right idea of what optimization is.
Your argument can be disproved by the fact that most competitive programmers use C++. For other languages, sometimes TL is scaled higher. Using C++ instead of Java is not an optimization.
Inputs are larger precisely to check the logic and to not let codes with worse time complexity pass.