sigma_mail's blog

Update in CFCheatDetector!
By sigma_mail, 5 months ago, In English

I want to say a big thank you to everyone who has used my site, CFCheatDetector. We've had over 30k views, and I’m really grateful for your support!

Because of the recent increase in visitors, I was curious about what people are searching for. So, I added a new feature called Searchboard.

The Searchboard shows the most searched profiles on CFCheatDetector and updates the rankings based on the number of searches. It’s a fun way to see which profiles are trending and what users are interested in.

I hope you like this new feature! Feel free to share any suggestions or feedback you have.

Thanks again for your support!

EDIT :: I have changed cheated contest to skipped contest because many people where getting offended and also add search bar for searchboard

  • Vote: I like it
  • +41
  • Vote: I do not like it

»
5 months ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Nice site!

→ Reply
»
5 months ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +20 Vote: I do not like it

searching up tourist is crazy

→ Reply
»
5 months ago, # |
← Rev. 2   Vote: I like it -17 Vote: I do not like it

On the scoreboard, maybe it's a good idea to also print out the result of the searches — so automatically you can see "oh, tourist is not a cheat, some other person is"

Also this has flaws I think — it says Um_nik and scott_wu cheated which I seriously doubt they did

→ Reply
  • »
    »
    5 months ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it +39 Vote: I do not like it

    I guess that depends on the definition of cheating. I wouldn't say I cheated, but I definitely (accidentally) helped other people cheat.

    → Reply
  • »
    »
    5 months ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it +4 Vote: I do not like it

    I supposedly cheated too, on a Div2A which is literally three if-statements... The website should probably say "contests skipped" instead.

    → Reply
    • »
      »
      »
      5 months ago, # ^ |
        Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

      Do you have any suggestions for more accurately determining if he has cheated? For instance, we could check the past 10 contests or see if he has more than 3 skipped contests.

      instead of downvoting people can actual help to improve it!

      → Reply
      • »
        »
        »
        »
        5 months ago, # ^ |
          Vote: I like it +1 Vote: I do not like it

        3 is a bit more

        I believe >= 2 in the last 3 months should be the criteria

        → Reply
    • »
      »
      »
      5 months ago, # ^ |
        Vote: I like it +10 Vote: I do not like it

      Same, but in my case an EDU round B (193840653), which was just two ifs inside a for loop. Funny thing is that even though my submissions got skipped and I got a notification saying my code matched someone elses, I still got the rating change from that round. It's already been over an year since this happened, and I tried messaging Mike but nothing happened. It doesn't really make much of a difference now, but it would be nice to have those submissions unskipped.

      → Reply
      • »
        »
        »
        »
        5 months ago, # ^ |
          Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

        So do you have any suggestions on how can I improve the site so that it will be more accurate

        → Reply
        • »
          »
          »
          »
          »
          5 months ago, # ^ |
            Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

          It's very hard to differ accidentally skipped contests from contests a participant actually cheated on. If there was an easy way to do that, Mike would have already implemented something like that, and cases such as mine wouldn't exist. The only improvement I can see is taking cebolinha's advice and exchanging "cheated contests" for "skipped contests".

          → Reply
          • »
            »
            »
            »
            »
            »
            5 months ago, # ^ |
              Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

            Updated, You can check now ! Also add a search field in searchboard

            → Reply
»
5 months ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +2 Vote: I do not like it

lol this blog is -12 from the cheaters downvoting it

love the site btw.

→ Reply
»
5 months ago, # |
  Vote: I like it +14 Vote: I do not like it

Must be an interesting story xD

sigma_mail Cheated in 1 Contest(s)!!

→ Reply
  • »
    »
    5 months ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it +1 Vote: I do not like it

    I admit that I have use alt I'd ,I was getting wrong answer and to avoid panelty i tried on alt I'd but i was not aware about codeforces plag so I tried on alt I to solve that question and I got accepted on alt so I submitted same code on this I'd. I have cheated as per rule but I have solved that questions on my own.

    → Reply
»
5 months ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Mike was searched 300+ times.

→ Reply
»
5 months ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

Can we also make a CFFraudDetector where it decreases your rating by 400 and adjusts your title appropriately?

→ Reply
»
5 months ago, # |
← Rev. 3   Vote: I like it +3 Vote: I do not like it

I found a bug.

Search tourist in searchboard, there's one tourist with 204 searches at now and another tourist with 14 searches shown in a slightly different indentation. Both links to the same person.

To my experiment it's about trailing spaces after handle making your website recognizing them as different persons (but URL parsing strips them automatically)

→ Reply
  • »
    »
    5 months ago, # ^ |
      Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

    In the same vein, the handles are case sensitive, when they're not on codeforces.

    → Reply
»
5 months ago, # |
  Vote: I like it 0 Vote: I do not like it

How could so many ppl doubt tourist :(

→ Reply