Upd: the first 8 primes are not enough, because $$$341550071728321 = 10670053 \times 32010157$$$ (for hacker).
===
Hi everyone,
Generally speaking, using the sequence (2, 325, 9375, 28178, 450775, 9780504, 1795265022) as bases in the Miller-Rabin primality test is sufficient to check prime numbers below $$$2^{64}$$$.
However, this sequence is quite hard to remember. Some sources suggest using the first 12 prime numbers as bases, while others claim that the first 8 primes are enough. Unfortunately, these claims lack clear references.
I'm curious about the minimum number of $$$n$$$ if we use the first $$$n$$$ prime numbers as bases for testing primality below $$$2^{64}$$$.
Does anyone know a definitive answer or a reliable source for this?
Thank you!
English is not my native language; please excuse typing errors.
[DELETED] My previous thoughts were wrong.
https://miller-rabin.appspot.com/#
this website seems unstable, https://web.archive.org/web/20240709103303/https://miller-rabin.appspot.com/ here is
Auto comment: topic has been updated by weily (previous revision, new revision, compare).
Maybe the first 8 primes is for $$$2^{32}$$$? I'm not sure.
$$$3825123056546413051 = 149491 \times 747451 \times 34233211$$$, which is a stronger pseudoprime.
Now I know the first 12 prime numbers is necessary.
Thank You!
===
upd:
Strong Pseudoprimes: