I tried to solve this question. But I got WA. I thought I chose a greedy approach but it seems like I have missed a counter case here. Can some please point that out. Thanks!!
№ | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 3985 |
2 | jiangly | 3814 |
3 | jqdai0815 | 3682 |
4 | Benq | 3529 |
5 | orzdevinwang | 3526 |
6 | ksun48 | 3517 |
7 | Radewoosh | 3410 |
8 | hos.lyric | 3399 |
9 | ecnerwala | 3392 |
9 | Um_nik | 3392 |
Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
№ | Пользователь | Вклад |
---|---|---|
1 | cry | 169 |
2 | maomao90 | 162 |
2 | Um_nik | 162 |
4 | atcoder_official | 161 |
5 | djm03178 | 158 |
6 | -is-this-fft- | 157 |
7 | adamant | 155 |
8 | awoo | 154 |
8 | Dominater069 | 154 |
10 | luogu_official | 150 |
I tried to solve this question. But I got WA. I thought I chose a greedy approach but it seems like I have missed a counter case here. Can some please point that out. Thanks!!
Название |
---|
You are solving the problem with the correct logic, but the implementation is incorrect. When converting the array to a string, removing occurrences of the first or last element in the original array works only if every number in the array consists of a single digit.
In cases like the example
22 2 2 2 2
, when it is converted to the string222222
, your code will yield a result of zero because it incorrectly interprets the string as three instances of22
, which is wrong. The correct solution is to simulate the same logic, but using two pointers on the array.Thanks a lot for your help.
You are welcome