Would using LLMs to generate new test cases for a question be considered cheating? Can someone please ask mike about this?
Would using LLMs to generate new test cases for a question be considered cheating? Can someone please ask mike about this?
| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3792 |
| 2 | VivaciousAubergine | 3647 |
| 3 | Kevin114514 | 3611 |
| 4 | jiangly | 3583 |
| 5 | strapple | 3515 |
| 6 | tourist | 3470 |
| 7 | Radewoosh | 3415 |
| 8 | Um_nik | 3376 |
| 9 | maroonrk | 3361 |
| 10 | XVIII | 3345 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 162 |
| 2 | adamant | 148 |
| 3 | Um_nik | 146 |
| 4 | Dominater069 | 143 |
| 5 | errorgorn | 141 |
| 6 | cry | 138 |
| 7 | Proof_by_QED | 136 |
| 8 | YuukiS | 135 |
| 9 | chromate00 | 134 |
| 10 | soullless | 133 |
| Name |
|---|



Why some people can't use codeforces as before...
U can generate testcase using normal software.And many top rated coders do that I guess.It is clearly legal until unless u use AI to tamper your code.
So its not cheating?
I don't think generating test cases can be considered cheating. U dont even need AI to do that.There are softwares that generate random numbers of various range and those are available in google.
I do think it's cheating. Debugging and writing stress tests is part of solving a problem, and writing a generator that generates random numbers in a specific format is part of that. Unless the input is only a single number, google rng will not be of much use.
Try to do tasks completely without AI. That way, you'll actually learn something from them!
.