The problem goes like this:
You are given an integer array nums.
A nice permutation is defined as a permutation of any non-empty subset of nums such that the absolute difference between any two consecutive elements is exactly 1. A permutation of size 1 is considered nice by definition. A subset is any non-empty selection of elements from nums (regardless of order). A permutation of a subset is any reordering of the elements of a subset.
Your task is to compute the sum of all elements across all such nice permutations.
Since the total may be very large, output the result modulo $$$10^9 + 7$$$.
Input
- An array
numsof integers. - $$$1 \leq \text{nums.length} \leq 10^5$$$ (maybe no solution exists though ... I can't guarantee anything lol)
- $$$0 \leq \text{nums}[i] \leq 10^5$$$ (maybe no solution exists though ... I can't guarantee anything lol)
Output
- A single integer: the sum of all elements in all nice permutations of all non-empty subsets of
nums, taken modulo $$$10^9 + 7$$$.
Examples
nums = [1, 2, 3]
[1],[2],[3],[1,2],[2,1],[2,3],[3,2],[1,2,3],[3,2,1]are all valid.- The sum is 34.
[1, 3],[3, 1],[2,3,1],[2,1,3],[3,1,2], and[1,3,2]are not valid.
nums = [2, 3, 2]
[2],[2],[3],[2,3],[3,2],[2,3],[3,2],[2,3,2],[2,3,2]are all valid.- The sum is 41.
[2,2],[2,2],[2,2,3],[2,2,3],[3,2,2], and[3,2,2]are not valid.
Apart from brute-forcing all $$$\sum_{k=1}^{n} \binom{n}{k} \cdot k!$$$ possibilities, I can't find any way to do it. I feel like we should start by sorting and making clusters (for example [1, 2, 9, 10, 11, 12] would have two clusters, [1, 2] and [9, 10, 11, 12]), but that kind of got me nowhere.









Very stupid question, but are all the elements distinct? Then it could be easier. With duplicates, it won't. Even counting the possible nice permutatiosn would be difficult then.
No they’re not necessarily distinct
Well, if they were distinct, then any nice permuation subsets must be in increasing order or decreasing order. Then, sorting the original permutation would be a very good idea, because it could help you find those permutations easily
Stuck on duplicates
No you can do [1,2,1]
No you can't unless A has two 1's in it. We assume it has distinct. I am saying that non-distinct is harder
Ah yes yes, i was just saying there could be duplicates, sorry.
I think let's focus on making one for distinct element ones. It's very easy, if you think a bit. Like finding the sum.
Here's the one for distinct. It's in Python. SOrry for the time, it took a lot of time for that big-ass formula. Here's it:
SOrry, for the formatting, asked GPT to do it
Uhhh what
I could thought of a solution of n*2^n...
if you choose an element as starting point and then do recursion to choose the -1 or +1 (if exists) then keep a sum tracker go on with it.
Then it may be solvable for n<=12
Also starting point are distinct so , if there are multpile same numbers we only have to choose the distinct ones.
Too long. No, we do not need to choose distinct ones. SUppose you have two A's and one A-1. You can start a subset with A, A-1, A, so you were saying sth wrong
Edit: Why so many downvotes?
My idea does not work, plz. disregard.
okay
Okay, Jason, here's the solution for only distinct elements array in block form:
Isn't this O(n log n)? And also, did the format myself this time. The formula is the large one which is spread over multiple lines for better vision.
In the worst case, there is a possibility of (n*(n+1))/2 subarrays (after sorting), and you have put all such subarrays into "the_one_having_nice_subarray" and then you iterate over "the_one_having_nice_subarray". So there is definitely an n^2 factor in the time complexity. For example with [1,2,3,4] as input, "the_one_having_nice_subarray" will have 10 (=(4*(4+1))/2) subarrays in it.
Bro, it's collecting only maximal consecutive segments, and each element belongs to exactly one such segment., not all possiblwe subarrays. For example, on [1, 2, 6, 7, 8}, the subarrays are [1,2] and [6,7,8]. Where is the n^2 thing here?
It;s not doing [1], then [1,2], then [2], and so on, otherwise I knew it would take a long time. Type this:
See what it says. It says: ~~~~~ 1,2,3,4 ~~~~~ tHERE'S SUPPOSED TO BE two brackets around each side of 1,2,3,4, but it's not showing
Indeed, I made a mistake while analysing your code, it does run in O(nlogn)!
Thanks for confiming it! The GPT I use is free (and very stupid), so I don't believe it usually, like, when it tells me this code runs in n log n
The problem has a solution.
neh.. **your problem