My submissions got skipped and I got this message:
Attention! Your solution 368753790 for the problem 2210C2 significantly coincides with solutions contributor123/368740719, krakar/368753790. Such a coincidence is a clear rules violation. Note that unintentional leakage is also a violation. For example, do not use ideone.com with the default settings (public access to your code). If you have conclusive evidence that a coincidence has occurred due to the use of a common source published before the competition, write a comment to post about the round with all the details. More information can be found at http://mirror.codeforces.com/blog/entry/8790. Such violation of the rules may be the reason for blocking your account or other penalties. In case of repeated violations, your account may be blocked
The submissions themselves are enough to show there is no similarity. Kindly help in this regard.
+1
+2
Vladosiya, KAN can you kindly look into this.
Hi, you're right, I revoke the punishment for you. contributor123 has definitely cheated so punishment stays the same for this user.
Sorry for the inconvinience and thank you for reaching out.
No problem at all! Thank you!
+три
Seems very different runtime, different memory use, the most common thing is that both of you have a list of primes in your code.
I don't know why it judges as cheating. I think this is not similar at all. Maybe you should also mention the writer of this contest.
Thank you. Argentum47 can you please look into this?
+1. They aren't alike at all. If anything, looking at contributor123 submissions during the contest makes it extremely clear they are the only one cheating.
contributor123 is cheating because he use the "gcdcode" variable/function (i think so because i notice a hidden prompt injection in the original statement of C2)
seems likely, agreed
I can vouch for krakar. The submissions don't look alike either, except for the list of primes.
+1
i believe KAN said this was a false message and the real reason people got skipped on this problem was for being ai detected, but im not sure how they detected and how accurate it is.
That message was different afaik, It had a lot more users mentioned in the same message. This is still a false flag either way. Hopefully any response from KAN or anyone else from admin can clarify this.
bro got contribution..