I have a question that : cin/cout with ios_base::sync_with_stdio(0) and scanf/printf. Which is faster? Can anybody help me? Thank you a lot!
№ | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 3880 |
2 | jiangly | 3669 |
3 | ecnerwala | 3654 |
4 | Benq | 3627 |
5 | orzdevinwang | 3612 |
6 | Geothermal | 3569 |
6 | cnnfls_csy | 3569 |
8 | jqdai0815 | 3532 |
9 | Radewoosh | 3522 |
10 | gyh20 | 3447 |
Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
№ | Пользователь | Вклад |
---|---|---|
1 | awoo | 161 |
2 | maomao90 | 160 |
3 | adamant | 156 |
4 | maroonrk | 153 |
5 | atcoder_official | 149 |
6 | -is-this-fft- | 148 |
6 | SecondThread | 148 |
8 | Petr | 147 |
9 | Vladosiya | 144 |
9 | nor | 144 |
I have a question that : cin/cout with ios_base::sync_with_stdio(0) and scanf/printf. Which is faster? Can anybody help me? Thank you a lot!
Название |
---|
look at this
or at this
Why don't you try to read 5*10^6 or 10^7 integers and see the difference?
cin/cout uses operator <<. That is function. If you do cin >> a >> b >> c; you call 3 functions. scanf, printf should be faster still. cin/cout are comfortable and simple, but not flexible as scanf/printf. If you want to find a way to get rid of scanf/printf then it is bad idea. I always recommend to use scanf/printf. There is no thing that scanf/printf can't but cin/cout can.
There is no thing that scanf/printf can't but cin/cout can.
To read string for example?
std::string seems like is using vector like container. This trick does it. But I am not talking about that. I am talking about reading 14 and 32 from "14:32" by ignoring ':', reading string(including spaces and newlines) until ';' or '$'. I do not think that cin can to that easily.