In medieval standards, this was better. However, the Spanish inquisition is the past where as Muslim inquisition kills people almost every day

================================================

Cristians also kill muslims only because they are muslims nowadays.

Lol at least one modern example?

======================================================= warning: in russian

Good try! This makes that 1 (ONE) Muslim has been killed by Christians because he was a Muslim. However, you said "Muslims" which in English implies more than one!

There is a link on that page...

Ok you are correct! But what about total ratio about Christians killed by Muslims on because of religion vs. Muslims killed by Christians because of religion? Is it less than 9000:1 ?

===================================================== If you count the victims of crusades, the ratio wiil be much less than 9000:1.

====================================================== https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siege_of_Jerusalem_(1099)#Massacre — here is written that there were 10000 dead. Ara you going to tell me about 90000000 people killed by muslims?

Crusades are in the past, like tyrannosaurs. And they don't really count because they were wars, it's difficult to determine if a person was killed because of religion or not. Eventually, no Muslims nations converted into Christianity because of crusades but Muslims converted most of Bosnia & Albania.

One modern example?! Only one?! LOL

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persecution_of_Muslims#Modern

You are welcome!

======================================================== 1) 9/11 was in the past, let's not talk about it.

2) Do you compare convertion with death? Bosnians were given a choice: to pay a fee, to die or to convert. But a few centures before muslims in Jerusalem were given a choice: to die or to die(

"Granada wasn't a part of Castile" is like saying "Rhodesia is a white country because it's founded by whites"

====================================================== Is Australia a "white country"?

If you are asking if it has a white majority, the answer is yes. BTW Australians feel terribly sorry for having conquered aborigines land and there's affirmative programs for them, it's not anywhere close to how Muslims treat minorities.

BTW Australians feel terribly sorry for having conquered aborigines land

Oh, muslims... Why can't you simply stop it?

Hey, I am just trolling man :P

On the other hand, I got the point, ain't I?

Why don't you think, that he is an atheist? I think, he used his arguments only for religious people, like muslims.

Why do you bring his religion into the argument? The claims he makes and their implications aren't dependent on such specifics.

I didn't bring his religion, I just said, that he used his argument for religous people, who believes in god. Actually, you haven't answered my question: what was the reason for you to write in this dead blog? You think that it is funny to restart this islamic diskussion?

>Why don't you think, that he is an atheist?
>that he is an atheist?

That's an interesting way to "not bring his religion".

>No, I was pointing out what that claim would imply (and of course, that it's not a valid argument for anyone who does believe in free will).

I believe this is what one would call "answering your question".

I have a question for you, then: why did you reply here? You could leave the ad hominems to PMs if you wanted.

And CF shows old comments in blue sometimes and I didn't look at the time, that's why I replied. Whatever.