| № | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3792 |
| 2 | VivaciousAubergine | 3647 |
| 3 | Kevin114514 | 3603 |
| 4 | jiangly | 3583 |
| 5 | turmax | 3559 |
| 6 | tourist | 3541 |
| 7 | strapple | 3515 |
| 8 | ksun48 | 3461 |
| 9 | dXqwq | 3436 |
| 10 | Otomachi_Una | 3413 |
| Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
| № | Пользователь | Вклад |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 157 |
| 2 | adamant | 153 |
| 3 | Um_nik | 147 |
| 4 | Proof_by_QED | 146 |
| 5 | Dominater069 | 145 |
| 6 | errorgorn | 141 |
| 7 | cry | 139 |
| 8 | YuukiS | 135 |
| 9 | TheScrasse | 134 |
| 10 | chromate00 | 133 |
| Название |
|---|



the input size if small (the largest factorial you will need is 20!) so here you can generate all the possible factorials and use bitmasking (or recursion) to pre-calculate all possible values and cache them ... then for every case you just output the answer
I pre-calculate all the value upto 20. But now i cant understand how can i find my desired number .
I have no idea about bitmasking. Is there any other way ?
Use brute-force. For each number there are two cases — to use or not to use :)
If i use brute-force, at some stage summation of fact(num) may exceed my desired n , at that case i may avoid that fact(num) . But can i surely say that at any stage summation of fact(num) will be equal to my desired n ?
I think that this approach will result in TLE since the limit is 0.5 :) I think it is better to read Caraz96's idea and ask if you misunderstood something in it.
It is possible to use a greedy approach: since fact(n) > fact(0)+fact(1)+...+fact(n-1) (this is true for each n > 2) you can iterate from the greatest factorial(20!) to the smallest one, if fact[i] is less than or equal to N you must take it, decrease N by fact[i] and proceed with the next factorial. At the end, if N is 0 you found the solution, otherwise it is impossible to obtain N adding factorials.