| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3792 |
| 2 | VivaciousAubergine | 3647 |
| 3 | Kevin114514 | 3603 |
| 4 | jiangly | 3583 |
| 5 | turmax | 3559 |
| 6 | tourist | 3541 |
| 7 | strapple | 3515 |
| 8 | ksun48 | 3461 |
| 9 | dXqwq | 3436 |
| 10 | Otomachi_Una | 3413 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 157 |
| 2 | adamant | 153 |
| 3 | Um_nik | 147 |
| 4 | Proof_by_QED | 146 |
| 5 | Dominater069 | 145 |
| 6 | errorgorn | 141 |
| 7 | cry | 139 |
| 8 | YuukiS | 135 |
| 9 | TheScrasse | 134 |
| 10 | chromate00 | 133 |
In 23-rd line you multiply ints up to 106. It will cause overflow. And be careful about number of digits in output.
I corrected the overflow situation but again I am getting segmentation fault. Could you please check it again? My new solution is here
You are running out of memory. Use vector instead of array with size 50k in line #99. Btw. it is not implemented optimally (complexity is with log^2 I think). I suggest you check out this algorithm with set. It is much simpler.
For example consider test where all points have the same x-coordinate. Then your program is
. It can be fixed but it's nothing fun.
I fixed the size of that array to n everytime. Got accepted now. Thanks bro.
simpler way to find closest pair: link
Similar solution with O(N log N) time https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/closest-pair-of-points-onlogn-implementation/