Here are TLE code and AC code of the problem 504D-Misha and XOR, the difference between them is only the condition of the for loop, but i<maxn && m>=0
is a stronger condition. Does anyone have idea about what happened? Thanks a lot.
№ | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 3985 |
2 | jiangly | 3814 |
3 | jqdai0815 | 3682 |
4 | Benq | 3529 |
5 | orzdevinwang | 3526 |
6 | ksun48 | 3517 |
7 | Radewoosh | 3410 |
8 | hos.lyric | 3399 |
9 | ecnerwala | 3392 |
9 | Um_nik | 3392 |
Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
№ | Пользователь | Вклад |
---|---|---|
1 | cry | 169 |
2 | maomao90 | 162 |
2 | Um_nik | 162 |
4 | atcoder_official | 161 |
5 | djm03178 | 158 |
6 | -is-this-fft- | 157 |
7 | adamant | 155 |
8 | awoo | 154 |
8 | Dominater069 | 154 |
10 | luogu_official | 150 |
Here are TLE code and AC code of the problem 504D-Misha and XOR, the difference between them is only the condition of the for loop, but i<maxn && m>=0
is a stronger condition. Does anyone have idea about what happened? Thanks a lot.
Название |
---|
I've added
inline
and it's Accepted with the condition 11191452It's really interesting to know why this happened!
And then I changed
m>=0
tom>=-1
got Accepted... 11191443What's the difference between inline function and simple function? I used TLE code's loop condition and added inline — AC.
This is even more weird!
Here I added a variable x, and made it equal to m, it got TLE.
Here I made it equal to m+1 before the loop, and equal to m in the loop, it got AC!
Here I made it equal to m before the loop, and don't change it in the loop, it got AC!
Maybe it is a bug in the compiler optimizer? I hope someone figures that out!