I used to program in c++ and I know that dijkstra implemented on priority_queue works faster than the one implemented using set. What is the best dijkstra implementation in java ? Should I use TreeSet or Priority queue ?
| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3792 |
| 2 | VivaciousAubergine | 3647 |
| 3 | Kevin114514 | 3603 |
| 4 | jiangly | 3583 |
| 5 | strapple | 3515 |
| 6 | tourist | 3470 |
| 7 | dXqwq | 3436 |
| 8 | Radewoosh | 3415 |
| 9 | Otomachi_Una | 3413 |
| 10 | Um_nik | 3376 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 158 |
| 2 | adamant | 152 |
| 3 | Um_nik | 146 |
| 4 | Dominater069 | 144 |
| 5 | errorgorn | 141 |
| 6 | cry | 139 |
| 7 | Proof_by_QED | 136 |
| 8 | YuukiS | 135 |
| 9 | chromate00 | 134 |
| 9 | TheScrasse | 134 |
I used to program in c++ and I know that dijkstra implemented on priority_queue works faster than the one implemented using set. What is the best dijkstra implementation in java ? Should I use TreeSet or Priority queue ?
| Name |
|---|



Since you only care about the minimum element in Dijkstra, I believe that Priority Queue will be better. I think it's less work to maintain a heap than a TreeMap for the sole purpose of getting the minimum element.
Also, most top JAVA coders I saw always used a PriorityQueue, I guess if TreeMap was more efficient for that purpose, they would have done it.