#define foreach(ite,sets) for(__typedef(sets.begin()) ite=sets.begin();ite!=sets.end();ite++)
Do you like this code?
gl & hf
Do you like this code?
gl & hf
№ | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 4009 |
2 | jiangly | 3823 |
3 | Benq | 3738 |
4 | Radewoosh | 3633 |
5 | jqdai0815 | 3620 |
6 | orzdevinwang | 3529 |
7 | ecnerwala | 3446 |
8 | Um_nik | 3396 |
9 | ksun48 | 3390 |
10 | gamegame | 3386 |
Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
№ | Пользователь | Вклад |
---|---|---|
1 | cry | 167 |
2 | Um_nik | 163 |
3 | maomao90 | 162 |
3 | atcoder_official | 162 |
5 | adamant | 159 |
6 | -is-this-fft- | 158 |
7 | awoo | 157 |
8 | TheScrasse | 154 |
9 | Dominater069 | 153 |
9 | nor | 153 |
Название |
---|
STL for_each
Surely there are far more languages, I just suppose that java syntax would not be radically new to C++ programmer and performance decrease would not be radical too... Note that I am not against C++ (I use it for more than 10 years already), but sometimes I feel that there is too much plus-pluses for one poor programmer... ;-)
int[] a = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5};
for (int x : a) {
x *= 2; // actually elements of array don't change
}