Блог пользователя Kostroma

Автор Kostroma, 8 лет назад, По-русски
Tutorial is loading...
Code
Tutorial is loading...
Code
Tutorial is loading...
Code
Tutorial is loading...
Code
Tutorial is loading...
Code
Tutorial is loading...
Code
Tutorial is loading...
Code
Разбор задач AIM Tech Round 3 (Div. 1)
  • Проголосовать: нравится
  • +79
  • Проголосовать: не нравится

»
8 лет назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится +4 Проголосовать: не нравится

Hi, I am not able to understand the string generation part of Recover string problem div2 D. Please explain the intution and other insight for the problem.

Thanks All

  • »
    »
    8 лет назад, # ^ |
      Проголосовать: нравится +2 Проголосовать: не нравится

    I rewrote editorial, please check.

  • »
    »
    8 лет назад, # ^ |
      Проголосовать: нравится +1 Проголосовать: не нравится

    Mine solution is a bit different from the bubble sorting which the editorial provided, but I hope this helps.

    Consider that for each '1's in the string generated, the amount of sub-sequences of "10" that contains this '1' equals to the amount of '0' after it. By this fact, we can build a greedy solution and determine if '1' or '0' should be put on position i.

    Case 1: There are more unused '0's than "10" that are yet to be built -> put '0' here since '1' will not fulfill the situation.

    Case 2: The counterpart of case 1 -> put '1' here and it won't violate the situation.

    This works because we have checked that cnt(1) * cnt(0) = cnt(01) + cnt(10), and this greedy solution can always get a result string of exactly c sub-sequences of "10".

    The time complexity is O(n).

  • »
    »
    8 лет назад, # ^ |
    Rev. 2   Проголосовать: нравится +6 Проголосовать: не нравится

    For the linear time solution approach try considering the following example:

    Suppose given input of : 1 4 2 3

    Then number of 0's=2

    And number of 1's=3

    Clearly there will be a solution ( (4+2)==2*3 )

    Then we are moving from the string of 00111 to the desired string as follows (in braces follows the aii's):

    00111 {1,6,0,3}

    Shift one zero to end

    01110 {1,3,3,3}

    Now shifting the other zero will not lead to ans as a01 which is 3 now will only decrease.

    Then move the 0 just moved to the left by the amount needed to equate it to the a01 given in the input ( 4-3=1)

    Moving that 0 left gives the desired ans

    01101 {1,4,2,3}

    • »
      »
      »
      8 лет назад, # ^ |
      Rev. 3   Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

      There is also online algorithm.

      Suppose, we know the string should have n zeros and m ones. It means the total length should be n + m.

      We will create our string one character at a time from left to right. At each position we have a choice — either we put 0 or we put 1. Let's start from the first position.

      If we place 0 as the first character, we will have m pairs of the type 01 (because we will have to put m ones after the current zero in the future). If we place 1 as the first character, we will have n pairs of the type 10.

      At i'th position we know that we should have a01 and a10 pairs of appropriate type. Placing 0 at current position inevitably leads to generating some amount of pairs of type 01. If this amount is greater than a01, it means that we cannot place 0 in the current position.

      This logic leads to the following code.

      while (n + m)
      {
          if (a01 >= m)
          {
              cout << 0;
              a01 -= m;
              n--;
          }
          else
          {
              cout << 1;
              a10 -= n;
              m--;
          }
      }
      
»
8 лет назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

I am lost in the prove of Div1C... Could someone explain the prove a bit less formal?

  • »
    »
    8 лет назад, # ^ |
      Проголосовать: нравится +31 Проголосовать: не нравится

    Here's a simpler explanation for Div.1 C :

    Fix the centroid as the root of the tree (can be found in O(n)). Now, for a given vertex x, we need to see if it can be a centroid by replacing an edge. Let the root be r and the subtrees be S1, S2, ..., Sk. The key is to note that if we remove x, the components in the subtree of x is definitely small (i.e. at most ), since r is the centroid. Also, the link from it to its parent is removed. Also, an edge replacement will clearly remove an edge from the remaining tree (the tree obtained after removing x's subtree) and replace it with an edge connecting to x (otherwise it doesn't change anything). Thus, when x is removed, the newly placed edge is removed as well. This means that we only need to find the edge to remove in the remaining tree to minimize the maximum size of the two resulting components. Also, this can be thought as taking a subtree out of the remaining tree. Since the subtree size is at most (r is the centroid), we need to maximize the size of the subtree we take, which does not contain r. Now, it is clear that we'll remove one of S1, S2, ..., Sk and we can easily calculate the answer by storing the two maximum subtree sizes among these subtrees.

    Code : 20156041

    • »
      »
      »
      8 лет назад, # ^ |
        Проголосовать: нравится +8 Проголосовать: не нравится

      Great solution!

    • »
      »
      »
      8 лет назад, # ^ |
        Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

      Your solution definitely seems to be easier to understand then the one given in editorial. But still I am unable to understand the crux of it. I get the solution till the part where you have removed x from the tree and link of par[x] and x is removed. After that I don't get the idea where you have placed the new edge. Can you please help me out here?

      • »
        »
        »
        »
        8 лет назад, # ^ |
          Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

        After you remove the link between par[x] and x, the graph effectively split into few trees, those that are "below" x and the big tree that contains the original root. The trees "below" x are small, since the root is the centroid. So, we need to only change the size of the big tree. Thus, it only makes sense to remove an edge from the big tree. Where do we add the extra edge? We just add it such that one of its endpoints is x, so when x is removed this edge disappears as well. Now, we are only left with the problem in determining which edge from the big tree to remove, which is simple.

    • »
      »
      »
      8 лет назад, # ^ |
        Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

      Thanks for the help, now I get how it works. =)

    • »
      »
      »
      8 лет назад, # ^ |
      Rev. 2   Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

      Regarding Div.1 C, I have 1 query. Why is it that only one of the subtrees of the original centroid(root) will be disconnected ? why cannot centroid be included in the removed portion ? I cant seem to prove this fact on my own. Pls help!

    • »
      »
      »
      8 лет назад, # ^ |
      Rev. 2   Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

      can u explain case when bestidx == -2 comes into play in your solution ? ie when sub[i] == best !

    • »
      »
      »
      8 лет назад, # ^ |
        Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится
»
8 лет назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

Even though I kept getting WA on case n = 1, there's "a don't think" way of solving Problem B using DP.

Run DP from left, and from right. Choose a point you start at,and depending on your direction keep multiplying the transitions by 2. Once you choose your point, don't, and just go forward/backward normally.

You should also take care of that you skip at most one item using a flag.

Not the best solution, but an easy way to solve it.

»
8 лет назад, # |
Rev. 2   Проголосовать: нравится +25 Проголосовать: не нравится

can someone please explain how to solve div 1 D ? or is there a general method to solve this kind of flows ?

  • »
    »
    8 лет назад, # ^ |
      Проголосовать: нравится +5 Проголосовать: не нравится

    Consider the case where ci = ∞ and there are no edges directed from or to the source and the sink. Let ini and outi be the total amount of input flow (flows towards vertex) and output flow (flows from vertex) of vertex i respectively. Let di be outi - ini, then we want to make di = 0 for all i.

    Build a costed flow graph with n + 2 vertex including a new source and sink, and the n representative of the vertices in the original graph. For every i, if di > 0, then construct an edge from source to i with cost 0 and flow di. Otherwise, construct an edge from i to sink with cost 0 and flow  - di.

    Consider every edge in the original graph from u to v with flow f, Build an edge from u to v with cost 1 and flow in the costed flow graph. Build an edge from v to u with cost 1 and flow f in the costed flow graph. Compute the min-cost-max-flow of the costed flow graph, and the minimum cost is the cost required to fix the flow.

    Reasoning is not hard after the graph is built, but as my explanation skill is horrible I tend to skip this part. After you see the reasoning, the handling of ci and source and sink should be trivial. (Though I overcomplicated a lot of things and got WA... TAT)

»
8 лет назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

In 709B, shouldn't we also pay attention for when we don't have to return to the point at the other side? For example, when the entry is: 2 5 2 8 We should only go to the leftmost checkpoint, but we shouldn't return to the rightmost checkpoint in order to pass through the right checkpoints because the only point that is to the right is the one we chose not to visit.

  • »
    »
    8 лет назад, # ^ |
      Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

    If you are not going to go to 8, then 2 is both leftmost and rightmost, and you need to go to it, and then to it again, but the second one cost you nothing

    • »
      »
      »
      8 лет назад, # ^ |
        Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

      Bad example, sorry. What about 3 5 3 4 10 4 is the rightmost (ignoring 10, obviously), but there's no need to go to it since I've already passed through it

»
8 лет назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

Div1C:

(assume its root is w), remove an edge uw between its subtree and the remaining tree, and add an edge between x and u

I guess we need to add edge between x and w (since subtree is rooted at w and is detached).

  • »
    »
    8 лет назад, # ^ |
      Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

    Thank you, it will be fixed as long as codeforces manage to take the new version of editorial from polygon.

»
8 лет назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится +8 Проголосовать: не нравится

In the main post you mentioned cheaters. What exactly happened?

  • »
    »
    8 лет назад, # ^ |
      Проголосовать: нравится +12 Проголосовать: не нравится

    It happens from time to time, some guys send equal solutions for the problems and after the contest they are banned.

»
8 лет назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

I think that the problem with problem A is that people did not realize that the "waste" is actually the juice and not the oranges you throw out. That is why I couldn't understand it at first.

»
8 лет назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

Can anyone see this code for the strings question and tell me what's wrong with it? http://ideone.com/sFgcXB

  • »
    »
    8 лет назад, # ^ |
      Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

    When the string only has a's you are not doing anything, when you should. The problem says that we must find one non-empty substring and make the changes asked. So when you have "aaaa" for example, you must shift the last letter. In this case the output would be "aaaz".

»
8 лет назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится +15 Проголосовать: не нравится

That may be a very stupid challenge, but it is also possible to solve Div1E for constraints like m ≤ 10, n ≤ 109 :P

»
8 лет назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

In the last paragraph for Div1E, it seems you dropped the t - 1 index from sum_dpr[t - 1][n]. It might be a bit obvious, but it confused me the first time I read it.

»
8 лет назад, # |
Rev. 2   Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

Hi. What is cnt array in Div1C (Centroids)? I have never heard this shortcut.

»
8 лет назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

For div1 E,what's the a/b-the probability mean? Isn't it the probability that each block not been destroyed?

»
8 лет назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится +5 Проголосовать: не нравится

Where is the editorial for problem D?

  • »
    »
    8 лет назад, # ^ |
      Проголосовать: нравится -8 Проголосовать: не нравится

    At the top of the editorial it says:

    Here is the part of the editorial, other problems will come a bit later
    
  • »
    »
    8 лет назад, # ^ |
      Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

    It is already here btw

    • »
      »
      »
      8 лет назад, # ^ |
        Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

      Are you telling me that if I code exactly what you said in editorial for problem D it will get AC? OK I will believe you.

»
8 лет назад, # |
Rev. 2   Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

ignore

»
8 лет назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

In the editorial for C shouldn't the -1 in the inequality be +1?

»
8 лет назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

For problem Div2 D (Div1 B):

"If a01 + a10 ≠ c0·c1, then answer is impossible."

How do you get this formula? What does it really mean?

Thanks

»
8 лет назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

For problem Div2 D (Div1 B):

"If a01 + a10 ≠ c0·c1, then answer is impossible."

How do you get this formula? What does it really mean?

Thanks

  • »
    »
    8 лет назад, # ^ |
      Проголосовать: нравится +3 Проголосовать: не нравится

    You have c0 zeroes and c1 1's. number of ways of choosing one 0 and one 1 are (c0 choose 1)*(c1 choose 1) which is c0*c1. Now all such pairs will either be contributing to a01(if the zero you chose came before the one you chose) or a10(if the one you chose came before the zero you chose) . There is no other possibility. Hence a01 + a10 = c0.c1.

»
8 лет назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

I can't get the point of problem C. When we remove the point which we want to turn into a centroid, do the incident edges get removed too?

»
8 лет назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

Hi, I always get TLE on test 21... I passed the test point which n = 400000 but I can't pass the 399999 one lol

Is it random? I use bfs instead to avoid stackoverflow.

»
8 лет назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

Why this tutorial is not attached as the contest materials in the contest page?