| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3792 |
| 2 | VivaciousAubergine | 3647 |
| 3 | Kevin114514 | 3603 |
| 4 | jiangly | 3583 |
| 5 | strapple | 3515 |
| 6 | tourist | 3470 |
| 7 | dXqwq | 3436 |
| 8 | Radewoosh | 3415 |
| 9 | Otomachi_Una | 3413 |
| 10 | Um_nik | 3376 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 158 |
| 2 | adamant | 152 |
| 3 | Um_nik | 146 |
| 4 | Dominater069 | 144 |
| 5 | errorgorn | 141 |
| 6 | cry | 139 |
| 7 | Proof_by_QED | 136 |
| 8 | YuukiS | 135 |
| 9 | chromate00 | 134 |
| 9 | TheScrasse | 134 |
| Name |
|---|



Auto comment: topic has been translated by Kane (original revision, translated revision, compare)
I first tried solving it with double hashing with primes 31 and 37. I got WA on Test 9. I changed the modulo, again WA on Test 9, so I realized it was because some hash was becoming zero along the way, and that's certainly not good when hashing...
My workaround was to make a list of primes and choose two randomly until all hashes are positive. I got AC with that. Here's the code -> C++ Double Hashing
I understand that you're asking specifically for the hashing solution, so you probably already know, but this problem can be solved simply by adding a copy of S to itself and then running KMP.
Here's the code for this solution: KMP Code (the hashing solution is above)