Had it been given that the sequence of integers p1,p2..pn is not necessarily a permutation, it would have been a more interesting problem ! How will we solve this modified version of the problem?
# | User | Rating |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 3985 |
2 | jiangly | 3814 |
3 | jqdai0815 | 3682 |
4 | Benq | 3529 |
5 | orzdevinwang | 3526 |
6 | ksun48 | 3517 |
7 | Radewoosh | 3410 |
8 | hos.lyric | 3399 |
9 | ecnerwala | 3392 |
9 | Um_nik | 3392 |
# | User | Contrib. |
---|---|---|
1 | cry | 169 |
2 | maomao90 | 162 |
2 | Um_nik | 162 |
4 | atcoder_official | 161 |
5 | djm03178 | 158 |
6 | -is-this-fft- | 157 |
7 | adamant | 155 |
8 | awoo | 154 |
8 | Dominater069 | 154 |
10 | luogu_official | 150 |
Had it been given that the sequence of integers p1,p2..pn is not necessarily a permutation, it would have been a more interesting problem ! How will we solve this modified version of the problem?
Name |
---|
Maybe you find amount of strongly connected components ?
Not really, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 5 needs just one change!
I didn't read the statement carefully and thought this was the condition and tried to solve the harder problem, but failed due to missing a case. :(
Same here :(
Same here :D I solved the harder version in the contest :D
I guess just one extra change has to be made if components = 1 and graph is not cycle then ans++
Nope, it will fail on this test :
7 2 3 4 7 6 1 6
0 1 0 0 0 0 0
what's the answer in that case? isn't it 5?