### Errichto's blog

By Errichto, 7 years ago,

Code: 25627790

Code: 25627860

Code: 25627873.

Code: 25627885.

Code: 25627898.

Code: 25627911.

Code: 25627924.

Tutorial of VK Cup 2017 - Round 1
• +51

| Write comment?
 » 7 years ago, # |   0 Auto comment: topic has been updated by Errichto (previous revision, new revision, compare).
 » 7 years ago, # |   +8 Can we use CenTroid Decompositions for problem D div 2 ??
•  » » 7 years ago, # ^ |   +1
•  » » » 7 years ago, # ^ |   0 Can you explain how you did it?
•  » » » » 7 years ago, # ^ | ← Rev. 2 →   +4 For example, the logic of the solution can be like this:In the centroid decomposition for each centroid we calculate the distances from all its vertices and store it in map. Now we use the theorem that on the path between two vertices there is one and only one centroid that contains these vertices. Then with the help of dfs we go around the centroid decomposition, in the centroid we calculate all . All the vertices of the centroid are marked by those visited, climbing up the centroid tree to recalculate distances from the vertices that have not yet been visited.
•  » » » 7 years ago, # ^ |   0 Thank you :)
 » 7 years ago, # |   +13 And why my solution for F works? I tried to prove it for an hour and only after that decided to submit anything at the end. Why is it sufficient to suggest halfplanes between nearest points (sorted by angle) and the furthest from some till 180 degrees?
•  » » 7 years ago, # ^ |   0 The editorial contains a proof but it will be refreshed only after the system testing, it's a technical "feature".
•  » » 7 years ago, # ^ |   0 Can someone explain how to get the points "almost opposite p_1" for a point p_j?
•  » » » 7 years ago, # ^ |   0 Sort points by angle and use two pointers.
•  » » » » 7 years ago, # ^ |   0 But you have to sort points by angle with respect to p_i, not with respect to p_1. So naively, you have to sort the points one time for each point, which TLEs.
•  » » » » » 7 years ago, # ^ |   0 Everything should be done with respect to p1. So we sort points p2, p3, ..., pn with respect to p1.
•  » » » » » » 7 years ago, # ^ |   +18 Thank you for the response. It seems I didn't read the proof carefully enough. The question is beautiful :)
 » 7 years ago, # | ← Rev. 2 →   0 771C "Tutorial is not available"? edit: nvm
 » 7 years ago, # |   0 Where is your code for problem C?
 » 7 years ago, # | ← Rev. 2 →   0 All tutorials are already imported from Polygon. At the end of each tutorial you can find my code in C++.
•  » » 7 years ago, # ^ |   +30 When I click on submission link, it says that I am not allowed to view it.
•  » » » 7 years ago, # ^ |   0 Should be fixed now.
 » 7 years ago, # |   +7 in problem "Different Names""If the i-th given string is "YES", make names i and i + k - 1" i think you meant if it is "NO"
•  » » 7 years ago, # ^ |   +1 Thank you, fixed!
 » 7 years ago, # |   0 Can "Different Names" be explained a little better?
•  » » 7 years ago, # ^ |   0 Here's my approach.Iterate over given array s. If value is YES, make current sequence filled with unique names, otherwise repeat one value. To keep it simple, make first and last value of current sequence same. So, in next iteration, first k-1 names will be unique. You just need to decide whether to repeat first one or make it unique.Coding approach: First select k-1 unique names. Now, according to values of s[0] to s[n-k], if s[i] is YES, then generate new name and store it as answer of (i+k)th name. Otherwise, store answer of (i+k)th name as (i+1)th name.25618238
 » 7 years ago, # |   +1 Not allowed to see the code
 » 7 years ago, # |   0 Can we solve problem B using BFS?
•  » » 7 years ago, # ^ |   0 Yes you can
•  » » 7 years ago, # ^ |   0 Yes its your choice bfs or dfs. Although dfs seems easier.
 » 7 years ago, # | ← Rev. 3 →   0 For the Different Names editorial, it should be First generate n different names. If the i-th given string is NO, make names i and i + k - 1 equal. Note that it doesn't affect other groups of k consecutive names.
•  » » 7 years ago, # ^ |   0 _/_-^-
 » 7 years ago, # |   +8 I am not allowed to see the code !!!!
 » 7 years ago, # |   +13 My solution to the tree jump problem is O(nk). Precompute total path sums and count for each modulo for each subtree starting from bottom, then solve it again going down by subtracting your subtree from your parent node. Then sum up all the nodes, for runtime of 2nk+nCode:25623074
•  » » 7 years ago, # ^ |   0 mine too but due to smaller value of k our codes are slower than n*k*k due to recursion and extra constants maybe
•  » » » 7 years ago, # ^ |   +3 My code is probably slower because I copy k length vectors around because I'm lazy, probably at least k times faster if I just use an array to store k values.
•  » » 7 years ago, # ^ |   0 If not inconvenient to you, can you explain more detailed your solution? "total path sums" — to root? "count for each modulo for each subtree starting from bottom" — ?
 » 7 years ago, # |   +10 There is something I don't understand about 771C - Bear and Tree Jumps solution. what am I missing here? Isn't that the ceiling function? @.@And, suppose k = 5 and a simple tree with edges 1 - 2 and 1 - 3. There are two paths with remainder 1, they have f(L, k) = 4 so I must add 2·4 to the answer?Sorry if this is an extremely stupid question
•  » » 7 years ago, # ^ |   +3 Yeah, I'd like to understand that too...
•  » » » 7 years ago, # ^ | ← Rev. 5 →   +6 Pretty sure that its a typo. What he probably wants to say is that, if we find S and if we find , then . Here, countPaths(x, y) denotes number of paths of length x which give a remainder of y modulo k.
•  » » » » 7 years ago, # ^ |   +6 You are right. Should be fixed now.
•  » » » » » 7 years ago, # ^ |   0 "We know the sum of because its in total"This seems wrong since we're dealing with Integer Division here, right? Don't we have to add S and P (see my definition above) before we divide?
•  » » » » » » 7 years ago, # ^ |   +5 Here we use normal division, not integer. We added f(L, k) to make normal division and integer division produce same result, and then we use only normal division.
•  » » » » 7 years ago, # ^ |   0 Thanks! The typo got me very confused haha
 » 7 years ago, # |   +1 Can someone explain merging and how reminder is calculated in C, please?
•  » » 7 years ago, # ^ |   0 http://mirror.codeforces.com/contest/771/submission/25630872 Check this one. s is the subtree size (excluding the current vertex), p[u][x] stands for the number of such vetrices v in the subtree of v that the distance between (u, v) equals k * Y + x. d[u][x] is responsible for the sum of Y-s.
•  » » 7 years ago, # ^ |   0 Did you understood the merging part? If yes, can you please explain me?
 » 7 years ago, # |   0 Can someone please explain this solution of problem A(Bear and Big Brother)submission link : 25610202
•  » » 7 years ago, # ^ | ← Rev. 2 →   +1 Apparently the desire number of years we are looking for is the solution for the following inequation: 3^i * a > 2^i * b, which is equivalent to i > (log(b) — log(a)) / (log(3) — log(2)). That's the O(1) solution for this problem.I did my solution like that at first, but the double precision caused a WA on some tests. Thus it is better to be careful working with floating number.
 » 7 years ago, # | ← Rev. 2 →   +1 cheater caught anantheparty 25623078 jiangIy 25623055just find some keywords in both codes like 0x3f enjoy the rating changes :D
•  » » 7 years ago, # ^ |   +9 Hey dude, you were out of competition in last contest......Why? and How? Did you cheated?
•  » » » 7 years ago, # ^ |   +3 I confess. This is my way of returning to the right path
 » 7 years ago, # |   +1 It's a known problem to count the sum of distances for all pairs of vertices. Is there some book that describes it?Where does this problem come from?
•  » » 7 years ago, # ^ |   0 Problem Source: IX Urals Programming Contest. Yekaterinburg, April 19-24, 2005
•  » » 7 years ago, # ^ |   +3 It is called the wiener index. Here are some links that might come in handy:A diploma thesisAn article
•  » » 7 years ago, # ^ |   0 Refer the following link.. http://codereview.stackexchange.com/questions/135915/sum-of-all-paths-between-all-pairs-of-nodes-in-a-tree/158790#158790 Hope it'll help you out. :)
•  » » » 7 years ago, # ^ |   0 I understand how it works, but it was interesting where the problem itself came from =)Nevertheless, thank you for the link!
 » 7 years ago, # | ← Rev. 2 →   +29 After I read tutorial for Div1-D (E in official round), I still don't get what exactly I have to do to improve the DP to O(n), especially how to calculate Ci. Can anyone elaborate that part more specifically? Thanks in advance.
•  » » 7 years ago, # ^ |   0 Exactly :)
•  » » 7 years ago, # ^ |   0 Imagine the slower O(n2) solution that considers only particular O(n) states, including dp[i][i] (denoted as Ci). In my code in the editorial, the function go_from will be run only O(n) times.
•  » » » 7 years ago, # ^ |   0 Why will it run only O(n) times?
•  » » » » 7 years ago, # ^ | ← Rev. 4 →   0 Read the editorial just after "It turns out that the following values for each i are enough to solve the problem:". For each index i we will consider at most three states: dp[i][i], one dp[i][j], one dp[j][i]. Note that in two latter cases we have i < j.
 » 7 years ago, # |   +10 Can somebody explain this line of code in the given solution for the problem 771C Bear and Tree Jumps : int remainder = subtract(i + j, 2 * depth); why 2*depth?? Sorry if it's a silly doubt. Thanks in advance :)
•  » » 7 years ago, # ^ |   +10 The formula to calculate the distance from u to v in a rooted tree is depth(u) + depth(v) — 2 * depth(LCA(u, v)).It is the similar.
•  » » » 7 years ago, # ^ |   0 Thank You :)
 » 7 years ago, # | ← Rev. 3 →   +12 Can anyone explain to me this part of code in problem C? I don't understand it even after reading the editorial and the comments. for(int i = 0; i < k; ++i) for(int j = 0; j < k; ++j) { // compute distance modulo k int remainder = subtract(i + j, 2 * depth); // compute x such that (distance + x) is divisible by k int needs = subtract(k, remainder); answer += (long long) needs * count_subtree[a][i] * count_subtree[b][j]; } 
•  » » 7 years ago, # ^ | ← Rev. 6 →   +13 Count_of_subtree[a][i] is no of nodes whose distance from root is i( where i=distfromroot%k ) and belongs to subtree of a including a.Now we want distance between each pair of nodes. This is calculated using normal, dist(u, v) = dist(u) + dist(v) — LCA(u, v), here all distances are from root.Thus we see all pairs, 0...K-1 to merge the two sub-trees. need is the f(L, K) that needs to be added( to allow total distance to be divisible by k ). Now how many times times f(L, K) would be added, it is no of pairs i, j such that need = K- ( dist(i, j) % K ), which is nothing but count_subtree[a][i]*count_subtree[b][j]. In this way we recur up, and do it for all nodes. Here we use K(as MOD) to calculate distance between two nodes to avoid TLE by trying all nodes.
•  » » » 7 years ago, # ^ | ← Rev. 2 →   +6 Thanks for your answer. But why do add total_subtree[a] += total_subtree[b] and count_subtree[a][i] += count_subtree[b][i] after we calculate answer?
•  » » » » 7 years ago, # ^ |   +10 total_subtree[a] += total_subtree[b] because b is a child of a. To find out the total number of nodes in a's subtree, you recurse into every one of its children (here, b), compute their subtrees' total number of nodes, and then add it all up to a's subtree.count_subtree[a][i] += count_subtree[b][i] because count_subtree[u][j] means the number of paths starting at the root of the whole tree that end somewhere in the subtree rooted in u and have length j (mod k). Hence, if b is a child of a, then the paths described above which end in a's subtree include those that end in b's subtree (because a's subtree includes b's subtree, for all children b of a).
•  » » » 7 years ago, # ^ |   +3 int remainder = subtract(i + j, 2 * depth); Can you explain this line to me? Why is the disance ((i + j) — 2 * depth) % k?
 » 7 years ago, # | ← Rev. 3 →   0 Can someone please try to rephrase the explanation for Div2-D Bear and Tree Jumps? I followed both the text description and the author's code.I could not understand the part with the two imbricated for loops over k inside the DFS. The author states he's "computting distance modulo k" then proceeds to subtract 2*depth from i + j, which are remainders as far as I can tell. What distance is this? What are we actually trying to achieve here?Any visual explanation or suggestion for how to make sense of this?LE: Alright, I think I got it, given two subtrees rooted in vertices u and v respectively, and given: number of paths Pu from the (global) root, having length i (mod k), that end in u's subtree, as well as number of paths Pv from the (global) root, having length j (mod k), that end in v's subtree, we're trying to compute the lengths of the paths between those vertices in u's subtree where paths Pu end and those vertices in v's subtree where paths Pv end, hence we employ the LCA-like formula...
•  » » 7 years ago, # ^ |   0 As I_love_Lucy explained above, depth(u) + depth(v) — 2 * depth(LCA(u, v)).
 » 7 years ago, # |   0 If problem div2 D. Bear and Tree Jumps asked to print the sum of the number of jumps from every node, could it still be done using one dfs? Or two dfs must be applied in that case?
•  » » 7 years ago, # ^ |   0 I guess we would need centroids then.
•  » » 7 years ago, # ^ | ← Rev. 2 →   0 Yeah it could be done using two dfs. I used this exact approach to solve this problem. I calculated the number of jumps for each node to all other nodes, calculated their sum and print(sum/2) ! CODE Time complexity is O(n*k)
 » 7 years ago, # |   0 Can someone explain to me what's wrong with this submission please: http://mirror.codeforces.com/contest/791/submission/25671681
 » 7 years ago, # |   0 How to solve Bear and Tree Jumps? Can someone please explain in detail?
•  » » 7 years ago, # ^ | ← Rev. 2 →   +4 You can read: the editorial, comments under this blog, my code (provided in the editorial).
 » 7 years ago, # | ← Rev. 2 →   0 In problem 771D, what is the intuition behind coming up with that particular state ? I could not come up with anything like it when I thought of it on my own. My ideas revolved around having states for a n length string and relating it with answer for (n-1) length string but I could not come up with anything that worked. Is this (the one in the editorial) a common way of choosing states for these type of problems ? If not, could you suggest how to learn to come up with them during contests ?
•  » » 7 years ago, # ^ |   0 Thinking about some particular moves and how the string looks like after a few moves turns out to be hard (I think you can't get a solution this way). Instead, sometimes it makes sense to think about the final string and this is a way to go in this problem. If you will try to create a dp state to know something about the final string, you should get the idea similar to the one described in the editorial.
 » 7 years ago, # |   0 I am confused with statement that is given in Bear and Tree jumps's editorial..." We know the sum of L/k because it is S/k in total. "it might be S/k ,,, and it might not be equal to S/k...Even the first statement in the same paragraph says that answer is "AROUND" S/k, not exactly S/k... so am I understanding anything wrong there ???
•  » » 7 years ago, # ^ |   +3 S is defined as the sum of length (i.e. the sum of L), so S/k is equal to the sum of L/k.And yeah, the answer is something different than S/k, because the answer is equal to the sum of values L/k rounded up.
•  » » » 7 years ago, # ^ |   0 okay :)
 » 7 years ago, # |   0 It was a very interesting contest. It is sad that it is over
 » 7 years ago, # |   0 Does anyone have a proof of correctness for the solution for 771B — Bear and Different Names?I can't seem to understand why the other groups of k consecutive names are not affected if we place a duplicate at the start and end of each window of size k.I can see that the the duplicate element at the start of each group will be shifted out at the next iteration. But why doesn't the duplicate element at the end affect the other groups?
•  » » 7 years ago, # ^ | ← Rev. 2 →   0 Start by proving the following. We choose n different names and we make some two names i and i + k - 1 equal by replacing si + k - 1 = si. Do you agree that other groups of k consecutive names aren't affected?The second part is to notice that we can go from left to right and make that operation many times. The proof will still be correct. What matters is that last k considered names are different, not that all names are different.
•  » » » 7 years ago, # ^ |   0 We choose n different names and we make some two names i and i + k - 1 equal by replacing si + k - 1 = si. Do you agree that other groups of k consecutive names aren't affected?Sorry. But I don't understand why the other groups of k consecutive names aren't affected.
•  » » » » 7 years ago, # ^ |   0 If group is affected it contains both this names (all other names are different), but it means that it contains all the elements in between too. So, it contains at least this k element, so no other elements(because it contains exactly k), but if it's this group, then it's not other group
 » 7 years ago, # | ← Rev. 2 →   0 For 771C — Bear and the Tree Jumps, how did the author manage to derive that the solution for the sum of path length between all pairs of nodes is S/k?Also, I do not understand why f(L,k) contributes to the answer. How does it help us to minimize path length between nodes?Please advise.
•  » » 7 years ago, # ^ |   0 The sum of path length is S — this is how I defined it. And note that we don't minimize anything. We use f(L, k) to get rid of the ceil symbol:
•  » » » 7 years ago, # ^ | ← Rev. 2 →   0 Hi. Thank you for your quick reply. I understand your explanation but I do not understand why the answer is S/k. Also, if the solution does not minimize anything, why does it manage to compute minimum jumps between all pairs of vertices?
•  » » » » 7 years ago, # ^ |   0 Also, if the solution does not minimize anything, why does it manage to compute minimum jumps between all pairs of vertices? There is only one path between any two vertices in a tree.
•  » » » » » 7 years ago, # ^ |   0 Thanks! That clarifies half of my doubts. Do you know how the author got the expression S/k?
•  » » » » » » 7 years ago, # ^ |   0 Read my answer to papa-ka-para's comment (a few comments above).
•  » » » » » » » 7 years ago, # ^ |   0 I read the comment. Unfortunately, that was not the answer I was looking for. I am confused about how the expression S/k was derived in the first place?
•  » » » » » » » » 7 years ago, # ^ |   0 S is defined in the editorial. I divided it by k to get the expression S / k. It you ask about something else, use some other words.
•  » » » » » » » » » 7 years ago, # ^ |   0 Sorry if I didn't make my question clear. Why do you divide S by k?
•  » » » » » » » » » 7 years ago, # ^ |   0 Because the statement says that we should find the sum of ⌈ L / k⌉, so computing the sum of L / k is a reasonable start.
 » 7 years ago, # |   0 Why this code does not pass the tests?27540821The solution is based on KAN's code.25627860
•  » » 7 years ago, # ^ |   0 Maybe python recursion limit?
 » 7 years ago, # |   0 In 771C - Bear and Tree Jumps author states "For each subtree we compute the k values: for each remainder modulo k how many paths (starting from the root of this subtree) have this remainder." What does it mean that path starts in some vertex?
•  » » 7 years ago, # ^ |   +3 "A path starts in vertex X" means "Vertex X is one of two ends of a path".
 » 7 years ago, # |   0 In problem E(Rectangular strips), can anyone explain how to do the update operations in the dp and still manage to get overall complexity of O(n) ?? I am stuck on this part. Thanks!
 » 7 years ago, # | ← Rev. 3 →   0 Hi KAN! In 771A's code 25627860, shouldn't the type of "cnt_edges" be "long long"?
 » 5 years ago, # |   0 I dont' know if this was a stupid question or not. Tutorial : "It's a clique if and only if edges = (vertices)*(vertices-1)/2" but in your solution you only check 'edges = (vertices)*(vertices-1)'. what's the difference ? And how could your solution work? Thank you very much!!
•  » » 5 years ago, # ^ |   0 I count every edge $(a, b)$ twice: once from vertex $a$ and once from $b$.
 » 4 years ago, # | ← Rev. 3 →   0 #include #include using namespace std; const int N = 150000; int n, m, v_cnt, e_cnt; vector g[N]; bool used[N]; void dfs(int v) { v_cnt++; used[v] = true; for (int next : g[v]) { e_cnt++; if (!used[next]) dfs(next); } } int main() { cin >> n >> m; for (int i = 0; i < m; i++) { int a, b; cin >> a >> b; g[a - 1].push_back(b - 1); g[b - 1].push_back(a - 1); } int cnt = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) if (!used[i]) { v_cnt = 0, e_cnt = 0; dfs(i); if ((long long) v_cnt * (v_cnt - 1) != e_cnt) { cout << "NO" << endl; return 0; } } cout << "YES" << endl; return 0; } This code is for https://mirror.codeforces.com/contest/771/problem/AI have taken this code of one of the user. Can anyone tell me why values of a and b are decremented by 1 before push_back operations?
•  » » 4 years ago, # ^ |   0 It changes numbering from "1, 2, ..., N" to "0, 1, ..., N-1", which is better for programming because arrays are indexed from 0.
 » 4 years ago, # |   +10 My Limak and Tree Jumping Problem is based on rerooting and has better complexity than the editorial: 92087472
 » 3 years ago, # |   0 Can we solve 771A — Bear and Friendship using dsu ? Someone please share solution using dsu if possible. Thanks
•  » » 2 years ago, # ^ |   0
 » 17 months ago, # |   0 i solved problem C. Bear and Tree Jumps using REROOTED technique. i guess this approach is more easier to understandable than editorial solution.
 » 6 days ago, # |   0 .ComplaintFrame { display: inline-block; position: absolute; top: 0; right: -1.4em; } .ComplaintFrame a { text-decoration: none; color: #ff8c00; opacity: 0.5; } .ComplaintFrame a:hover { opacity: 1; } ._ComplaintFrame_popup p, ._ComplaintFrame_popup button { margin-top: 1rem; } ._ComplaintFrame_popup input[type=submit] { padding: 0.25rem 2rem; } ._ComplaintFrame_popup ul { margin-top: 1em !important; margin-bottom: 1em !important; } sorry for necroposting.for problem A, Bear and Big Brother, we want to find some year $k$ such that $a\cdot(3^k) > b\cdot(2^k)$why it ends in some finite amount of operations? the editorial says we don't need more than $6$ operations