Somebody please give some good approach.
# | User | Rating |
---|---|---|
1 | jiangly | 3976 |
2 | tourist | 3815 |
3 | jqdai0815 | 3682 |
4 | ksun48 | 3614 |
5 | orzdevinwang | 3526 |
6 | ecnerwala | 3514 |
7 | Benq | 3482 |
8 | hos.lyric | 3382 |
9 | gamegame | 3374 |
10 | heuristica | 3357 |
# | User | Contrib. |
---|---|---|
1 | cry | 169 |
2 | -is-this-fft- | 162 |
3 | Um_nik | 161 |
4 | atcoder_official | 160 |
5 | djm03178 | 157 |
5 | Dominater069 | 157 |
7 | adamant | 154 |
8 | luogu_official | 152 |
9 | awoo | 151 |
10 | TheScrasse | 148 |
Somebody please give some good approach.
Name |
---|
Here is my implementation
I thought of the same thing but did not do that during the contest and it's complexity is O(N*N*k),I wonder how did it pass the test cases? Correct me if I am wrong.
The judge data was pretty weak you see, many people solved it with O(k*n^2) solutions with a few optimizations. I would really like to know how to solve it in a better complexity.