set<int>s;
s.erase(s.begin());
I wanted to know whether removing the minimum element in set is a O(logN) or O(1) operation ?
I am quite confused about this situation.
Thanks in advance..
№ | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 3985 |
2 | jiangly | 3814 |
3 | jqdai0815 | 3682 |
4 | Benq | 3529 |
5 | orzdevinwang | 3526 |
6 | ksun48 | 3517 |
7 | Radewoosh | 3410 |
8 | hos.lyric | 3399 |
9 | ecnerwala | 3392 |
9 | Um_nik | 3392 |
Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
№ | Пользователь | Вклад |
---|---|---|
1 | cry | 169 |
2 | maomao90 | 162 |
2 | Um_nik | 162 |
4 | atcoder_official | 161 |
5 | djm03178 | 158 |
6 | -is-this-fft- | 157 |
7 | adamant | 155 |
8 | Dominater069 | 154 |
8 | awoo | 154 |
10 | luogu_official | 150 |
set<int>s;
s.erase(s.begin());
I wanted to know whether removing the minimum element in set is a O(logN) or O(1) operation ?
I am quite confused about this situation.
Thanks in advance..
Название |
---|
It takes amortized constant time. See here set::begin and here set::erase.
Thanks buddy
It says just "constant" (doesn't say about amortisation), but I doubt that's true.
"For the first version (erase(position)), amortized constant." (where position is an iterator) from http://www.cplusplus.com/reference/set/set/erase/
ah, sorry, I just followed Jakube's links, but both of them apparently go to std::set::begin
Yes, I noticed that too :)
Sorry, I fixed the link.