Блог пользователя coding_weeb

Автор coding_weeb, история, 7 лет назад, По-английски

Here is the problem's link : http://mirror.codeforces.com/contest/877/problem/D

In this problem I used BFS to solve it. In my WA submission I choose to break when the distance from the origin of the cell I am traversing is smaller or equal to the distance of the point of the front of the queue plus 1. In my accepted solution I choose to break when the distance from the origin of the cell I am traversing is smaller or equal to the distance of the point of the front of the queue. But I can't understand why my first solution fail. Can anyone give me the explanation ?

Correct : http://mirror.codeforces.com/contest/877/submission/31687084 WA: http://mirror.codeforces.com/contest/877/submission/31686998

  • Проголосовать: нравится
  • -3
  • Проголосовать: не нравится

»
7 лет назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится +3 Проголосовать: не нравится

Auto comment: topic has been updated by coding_weeb (previous revision, new revision, compare).

»
7 лет назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

Auto comment: topic has been updated by coding_weeb (previous revision, new revision, compare).

»
7 лет назад, # |
  Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

Undefined behaviour. xx + i can be greater than array size.

  • »
    »
    7 лет назад, # ^ |
      Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

    I have already taken care of that situation by creating a border around the original array.

    • »
      »
      »
      7 лет назад, # ^ |
        Проголосовать: нравится 0 Проголосовать: не нравится

      Ah, sorry. Let k = 3, xx = 3, yy = 3, dist[3][3] = 5, dist[4][3] = 6, dist[5][3] = INF. This situation is possible, if you have already been in xx = 4, yy = 2 and dist[4][2] = 5. You have to change dist[xx + 2][yy], but with +1 your code breaks.