| № | Пользователь | Рейтинг |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3792 |
| 2 | VivaciousAubergine | 3647 |
| 3 | Kevin114514 | 3603 |
| 4 | jiangly | 3583 |
| 5 | turmax | 3559 |
| 6 | tourist | 3541 |
| 7 | strapple | 3515 |
| 8 | ksun48 | 3461 |
| 9 | dXqwq | 3436 |
| 10 | Otomachi_Una | 3413 |
| Страны | Города | Организации | Всё → |
| № | Пользователь | Вклад |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 157 |
| 2 | adamant | 153 |
| 3 | Um_nik | 147 |
| 4 | Proof_by_QED | 146 |
| 5 | Dominater069 | 145 |
| 6 | errorgorn | 141 |
| 7 | cry | 139 |
| 8 | YuukiS | 135 |
| 9 | TheScrasse | 134 |
| 10 | chromate00 | 133 |
| Название |
|---|



Problem E (LISDL) was already appeared on Topcoder SRM 332 Div1 Hard . (Although I didn't know this problem during the contest)
and SnackDown Online Pre- elimination Round B 2016 as well
I think I have a better analysis for nim problem which gives
.Though it is not a big improvement.I want help to find what is the fault in my method if there is any. So idea is when that ceil(n/k)>
, do a single step. And when ceil(n/k)<=
.try to reduce ceil value by 1.Remember that N is original number and n is intermediate number.
Each of the two steps cannot take place more than
times.Complexity is
.
Please find fault in it.
Seems obvious to me. The number of steps where we subtract
is
and the number of steps where we subtract
is also
. Approximating the Euler limit is overkill.