Could anyone explain to me the proof for such a method of checking whether a number is primitive root or not http://zobayer.blogspot.com/2010/02/primitive-root.html
why should i check only certain numbers to be equal to one or not ?
Could anyone explain to me the proof for such a method of checking whether a number is primitive root or not http://zobayer.blogspot.com/2010/02/primitive-root.html
why should i check only certain numbers to be equal to one or not ?
| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3792 |
| 2 | VivaciousAubergine | 3647 |
| 3 | Kevin114514 | 3611 |
| 4 | jiangly | 3583 |
| 5 | strapple | 3515 |
| 6 | tourist | 3470 |
| 7 | dXqwq | 3436 |
| 8 | Radewoosh | 3415 |
| 9 | Otomachi_Una | 3413 |
| 10 | Um_nik | 3376 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 161 |
| 2 | adamant | 150 |
| 3 | Um_nik | 146 |
| 4 | Dominater069 | 144 |
| 5 | errorgorn | 141 |
| 6 | cry | 139 |
| 7 | Proof_by_QED | 136 |
| 8 | YuukiS | 135 |
| 9 | chromate00 | 134 |
| 9 | TheScrasse | 134 |
| Name |
|---|



Since n is a prime, we know that gφ(n) = gn - 1 = 1. We want to know if there is another exponent e < n - 1 such that ge = 1.
Let e be the smallest, positive integer with ge = 1. This means that the exponents that give 1 are exactly 0, e, 2e, 3e, .... This means that e divides n - 1. If e is really smaller than n - 1, then there must exist a prime factor p of n - 1, such that e still divides
. Which means that
.
So it is sufficient to check if any of the terms
, with p prime and p | n - 1, is equal to 1.