Hey! Does anybody have a solution in n log n for this? Given n rectangles, determinate a point which is included by a maximum number of rectangles (including the boundaries).
| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3792 |
| 2 | VivaciousAubergine | 3647 |
| 3 | Kevin114514 | 3603 |
| 4 | jiangly | 3583 |
| 5 | turmax | 3559 |
| 6 | tourist | 3541 |
| 7 | strapple | 3515 |
| 8 | ksun48 | 3461 |
| 9 | dXqwq | 3436 |
| 10 | Otomachi_Una | 3413 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 157 |
| 2 | adamant | 153 |
| 3 | Um_nik | 147 |
| 4 | Proof_by_QED | 146 |
| 5 | Dominater069 | 145 |
| 6 | errorgorn | 141 |
| 7 | cry | 139 |
| 8 | YuukiS | 135 |
| 9 | TheScrasse | 134 |
| 10 | chromate00 | 133 |
Hey! Does anybody have a solution in n log n for this? Given n rectangles, determinate a point which is included by a maximum number of rectangles (including the boundaries).
| Name |
|---|



It can be solved with sweep line algo and segment tree in $$$O(N \lg N)$$$.
I think that when sweeplining, for a certain x, you should perform all addition events for that x, then check for a new max, then all subtraction events for that x. Otherwise you might miss the correct answer if you perform a subtraction, then a query, then an addition.
Yes, I just give a rough idea. Those parts should be taken care when implementing.
It’s a very nice sketch. I just wanted to add the detail since I had also been thinking of the same solution for a little bit. I hope it helps the asker.
Yes, it helped me. Is this algorithm similar to that one: "find the number of intersections of segments, all segments parallel either Ox either Oy"? I think they are 90% the same, am I wrong?
You can think of each segment of length L as an 1xL or an Lx1 rectangle, so the rectangle problem is a generalization of the line segment problem.