Can someone explain or prove, why calculating all possible values for every interval doesn't get TLE?
I think it should be $$$O(n!)$$$.
| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3792 |
| 2 | VivaciousAubergine | 3647 |
| 3 | Kevin114514 | 3603 |
| 4 | jiangly | 3583 |
| 5 | strapple | 3515 |
| 6 | tourist | 3470 |
| 7 | dXqwq | 3436 |
| 8 | Radewoosh | 3415 |
| 9 | Otomachi_Una | 3413 |
| 10 | Um_nik | 3376 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 157 |
| 2 | adamant | 152 |
| 3 | Proof_by_QED | 146 |
| 3 | Um_nik | 146 |
| 5 | Dominater069 | 144 |
| 6 | errorgorn | 141 |
| 7 | cry | 139 |
| 8 | YuukiS | 135 |
| 9 | TheScrasse | 134 |
| 10 | chromate00 | 133 |
Can someone explain or prove, why calculating all possible values for every interval doesn't get TLE?
I think it should be $$$O(n!)$$$.
| Name |
|---|



There were atmost 10 operators
Ur complexity isn't $$$O(N!)$$$. Infact if u observe the pattern a bit, you'd find that it's complexity never gets multiplied by factor greater than 4 on increasing N by 1. It's pretty much less than $$$O(4^N)$$$ as well, and it's found out to be roughly O(Catalan Number). For more details, u should check the last part of it's official editorial. Ur solution is the DP solution.