you will be given an array. and q query. q and n all less than 100000.
In every query you will be given a k. how many subarray xor less than k?
** I think it can be solved by persistent trie. but i need another solution.
| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benq | 3792 |
| 2 | VivaciousAubergine | 3647 |
| 3 | Kevin114514 | 3611 |
| 4 | jiangly | 3583 |
| 5 | strapple | 3515 |
| 6 | tourist | 3470 |
| 7 | dXqwq | 3436 |
| 8 | Radewoosh | 3415 |
| 9 | Otomachi_Una | 3413 |
| 10 | Um_nik | 3376 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qingyu | 161 |
| 2 | adamant | 150 |
| 3 | Um_nik | 146 |
| 4 | Dominater069 | 144 |
| 5 | errorgorn | 141 |
| 6 | cry | 139 |
| 7 | Proof_by_QED | 136 |
| 8 | YuukiS | 135 |
| 9 | chromate00 | 134 |
| 9 | TheScrasse | 134 |
you will be given an array. and q query. q and n all less than 100000.
In every query you will be given a k. how many subarray xor less than k?
** I think it can be solved by persistent trie. but i need another solution.
| Name |
|---|



Lets rephrase the problem a little bit. Denote by P[i] the XOR of numbers a[1], a[2], ..., a[i]. Now the XOR of subarray [L, R] becomes P[R] XOR P[L — 1] and the problem boils down to finding how many pairs of numbers from a list, when XOR-ed give a number less than K. This problem can be solved in O(NlogN) with the help of the Walsh-Hadamard transform and you can get some insight for the implementation from here: https://csacademy.com/blog/fast-fourier-transform-and-variations-of-it
i only know fast walsh hadamard gives us... all pairs xor/and/or sum. i don't know about this variation. Thanks.